|
 Overall, in California, Florida, Massachusetts and New York - four
of the most populous U.S. states - pediatric transfers surged 25
percent: from roughly 64,000 in 2006 to close to 80,000 in 2011,
researchers report in Pediatrics.
The biggest increase in transfers was for kids with common health
problems like abdominal pain and asthma, offering fresh evidence
that even basic pediatric care is disappearing from community
hospitals, said senior study author Dr. Michael McManus of Boston
Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School.
“When kids are taken to their local hospital’s emergency department,
they are increasingly likely to be transferred to more distant
referral centers for care they used to be able to get at home,”
McManus said by email. “We now know that pretty much the same thing
is happening across the country.”
The researchers examined data on more than 252 million hospital
encounters for children and adults, including about 59 million that
resulted in admissions.
During the study, adult admissions remained constant at more than
7.1 million a year.
But the annual number of pediatric admissions declined 9.3 percent
from more than 545,000 in 2006 to slightly under 495,000 in 2011.
The range of conditions treated, also known as pediatric capacity,
declined at hospitals in all four states.
Over the course of the study, capacity declined an average of 13
percent in California, 24 percent in Florida, 27 percent in New York
and 25 percent in Massachusetts.
Across all four states, the ten conditions that had the biggest
average reductions in availability of pediatric care at local
hospitals included appendicitis, skin infections, asthma, broken
legs and tonsillitis.
The study wasn’t a controlled experiment designed to prove whether
or how transferring children from one hospital to another might
impact the quality of their care. It’s possible that transfer might
improve outcomes for some conditions and worsen outcomes for others,
the study authors note.
[to top of second column] |
“We know that patients want to be treated close to home if possible,
but children are not just little adults,” said Dr. Fizan Abdullah, a
researcher at the Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of
Chicago and Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
“They have special needs that can often best be treated by a
pediatric specialist,” Abdullah said by email.
Those specialists tend to be located where other pediatric services
are located, for instance in a facility that has a pediatric
anesthesiologist who is trained in the nuances of working with
children, Abdullah added. That’s why pediatric specialists tend to
gravitate toward children’s hospitals that have extensive resources
specifically for kids.
For care closer to home, telemedicine and second opinion consults
are often options, connecting hospitals that are sometimes closer to
home with a regional center, Abdullah said. Parents can also look
for satellite outpatient centers that are affiliated with a hospital
with pediatric specialists.
“The objective is to treat the child in the best way possible, with
the most expertise, and get them home as soon as possible,” Abdullah
said. “Physicians at the referring hospital, or children’s hospital,
can then also continue to work with their local provider as needed.”
When families have a choice of health insurance, they should also
make sure those hospitals caring for their kids are in their
insurance network, McManus advised.
“For families taking sick kids to their local hospital, they should
not be surprised if transfer is necessary to get the best care even
for common conditions,” McManus said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2oXMVNB Pediatrics, online December 20, 2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
