| 
		Trump's early moves spark alarm, 
		resistance within the government 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [February 01, 2017] 
		By Warren Strobel and Lesley Wroughton 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - At the U.S. State 
		Department, the dissent began building soon after President Donald Trump 
		signed an executive order late on Friday to limit immigration from seven 
		Muslim-majority countries.
 
 Opposition mounted through the weekend as a draft memo criticizing 
		Trump's policy was written up in Washington and circulated by email to 
		U.S. diplomatic posts around the world, according to multiple officials 
		involved in the effort.
 
 By Monday, two of the officials said they considered withdrawing their 
		names from the document, fearing a backlash.
 
 On Tuesday, just 12 days into Trump's presidency, the memo with some 900 
		signatures was delivered to the State Department policy planning office 
		and from there to other top officials, said one source familiar with the 
		document.
 
 Sources said this was an unprecedented number of names on a memo sent 
		through the department's formal "dissent channel."
 
 The memo is just one example of the alarm and, in some cases, resistance 
		spreading within the federal bureaucracy as Trump's administration makes 
		sharp policy turns while ignoring some of the agencies charged with 
		implementation, according to interviews with more than 20 current and 
		former U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity and in some 
		cases asked that their departments not be identified.
 
		
		 
		Still fearful of recriminations, one official said some diplomats 
		discussed whether they could qualify for professional liability 
		insurance, which would cover legal costs in the case of disciplinary 
		action, through the American Foreign Service Association union.
 The White House did not respond to an email requesting comment.
 
 Earlier, when the existence of the memo surfaced, White House spokesman 
		Sean Spicer warned that anyone at the State Department who questioned 
		Trump's immigration policies "should either get with the program, or 
		they can go."
 
 ROGUE TWEETS
 
 Elsewhere in the federal bureaucracy, officials have hastily saved 
		scientific research and public information on climate change and other 
		issues, fearing the new administration would strip it from their 
		websites.
 
 Officials have also set up alternative Twitter accounts to criticize the 
		administration. Reuters could not verify the owners of the roughly 50 
		"rogue" accounts.
 
 Other officials have begun debating whether to quit.Most of those whom 
		Reuters interviewed said that, while the administration's policies 
		concerned them, they are more worried that Trump might try to ignore 
		legal and legislative restraints on presidential power.
 
 Trump upset many by signing his controversial executive order on 
		immigration without consulting key agencies and members of Congress.
 
 "When they try to ram through things that have foreign policy and 
		national security implications, it demands consultation," said a career 
		official who worked in a part of the government charged with 
		implementing the immigration order. "But there was no meaningful 
		consultation, despite what they said."
 
 A career civil servant at the Federal Communications Commission said he 
		was considering quitting, citing a fear widespread at the agency "of 
		being cut out of the decision-making processes."
 
 Senator Bob Corker, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee 
		and a Republican like Trump, said he learned about the immigration order 
		only after the president had signed it.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			President Trump signs an executive order cutting regulations, 
			accompanied by small business leaders at the Oval Office of the 
			White House. REUTERS/Carlos Barria 
            
			 
			Corker said he talked with White House representatives on Sunday and 
			believed they had gotten the message on the need for inter-agency 
			coordination. 
			"I would find it hard to believe that they on Tuesday don't 
			understand that what they did on Friday could have been done in a 
			much better way," he said.
 TUSSLES
 
 Most new presidents, particularly Republicans, who favor limited 
			government, have tussles with the federal bureaucracy.
 
 President Ronald Reagan fired 11,000 air traffic controllers, all 
			federal employees, in 1981, early in his tenure, after they ignored 
			his order to return to work.
 
 But Philip Wallach, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution 
			think tank, said Trump's apparent hostility to those who must 
			implement his policies was in a different league.
 
 "There certainly is something about Trump's chip-on-the-shoulder 
			attitude that makes it seem like he's itching for a potential 
			long-term fight with the bureaucracy, rather than something he works 
			to develop a smooth relationship with," he said.
 
 To succeed with his economic reform agenda, Trump will need federal 
			agencies, Wallach said. "That's going to require a lot of 
			affirmative government work, not just smashing things up."
 
 Several government managers said they have advised their employees 
			not to react so early in Trump's presidency.
 
 "Some of the things Trump is doing are foolish and make no sense 
			from a management perspective," said a career State Department 
			official who supervises scores of civil servants.
 
 "But I've told my folks to be professional and stay calm – don't 
			panic," the official said. "What else can I tell them? Someone needs 
			to be an adult. Otherwise, we'd have chaos."
 
			
			 
			In a farewell speech to about 100 State Department officials on 
			Tuesday, Thomas Countryman, the acting undersecretary of state for 
			arms control and international security, called on colleagues to 
			stay despite their concerns.
 "We still have a duty - you have a duty - to stay and give your best 
			professional guidance, with loyalty, to the new administration," he 
			said. "Because a foreign policy without professionals is - by 
			definition - an amateur foreign policy. You will help to frame and 
			make the choices."
 
 (Additional reporting by John Walcott, Jonathan Landay, Matt 
			Spetalnick, David Rohde, John Shiffman, Roberta Rampton, Valerie 
			Volcovici, Arshad Mohammad, Patricia Zengerle, Mark Hosenball, Emily 
			Stephenson and Daniel Weissner; Editing by John Walcott, Kieran 
			Murray and Lisa Von Ahn)
 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |