| 
						Channeling Steve Jobs, 
						Apple seeks design perfection at new 'spaceship' campus 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [February 07, 2017] 
		By Julia Love 
 SAN 
		FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Inside the original Macintosh computer, Apple 
		co-founder Steve Jobs inscribed the signatures of his team, revealing 
		his deep concern for even the hidden features of his products.
 
 His last work – Apple Inc's <AAPL.O> sprawling new headquarters in 
		Cupertino, Calif. - will be a fitting tribute: a futuristic campus built 
		with astonishing attention to detail. From the arrangement of electrical 
		wiring to the finish of a hidden pipe, no aspect of the 2.8 
		million-square-foot main building has been too small to attract 
		scrutiny.
 
 But constructing a building as flawless as a hand-held device is no easy 
		feat, according to interviews with nearly two dozen current and former 
		workers on the project, most of whom would not be named because they 
		signed non-disclosure agreements.
 
 Since Apple unveiled its plans in 2011, the move-in date has slowly 
		receded: Jobs' initial projection was 2015, but this spring now seems 
		most likely, according to people involved in the project. A lengthy 
		approval process with the city contributed to the delay.
 
 Apple has not revealed the total price tag, but former project managers 
		estimate it at about $5 billion - a figure CEO Tim Cook did not dispute 
		in a 2015 TV interview. More than $1 billion was allocated for the 
		interior of the main building alone, according to a former construction 
		manager.
 
		
		 
		For all the time and money sunk into the project, some in the 
		architecture community question whether Apple has focused on the right 
		ends. The campus is something of an exception to the trend of radically 
		open offices aimed at fostering collaboration, said Louise Mozingo, a 
		professor and chair of the Department of Landscape Architecture and 
		Environmental Planning at U.C. Berkeley. Its central office building – a 
		massive ring of glass frequently likened to a spaceship – could be a 
		challenge just to navigate, she noted.
 "It's not about maximizing the productivity of the office space, it's 
		about creating a symbolic center for this global company," she said. 
		“They are creating an icon.”
 
 An Apple spokeswoman declined to comment for this story.
 
 WORLD'S LARGEST PIECE OF CURVED GLASS
 
 Tech companies have long favored generic office parks, which allow them 
		to lease and shed space through booms and busts. Jobs’ unveiling of 
		what's formally known as Apple Campus 2, months before his death, marked 
		a new chapter in Silicon Valley architecture.
 
 When completed, the campus will house up to 14,200 employees, according 
		to the 2013 project description. The main building – which boasts the 
		world's largest piece of curved glass – will be surrounded by a lush 
		canopy of thousands of trees. Little remains from the cement-laden 
		campus Apple acquired from Hewlett-Packard, though the iPhone maker 
		preserved a century-old barn that remained intact as the land passed 
		from tech giant to tech giant.
 
 But what was most striking to those who worked on the project was Apple 
		managers' insistence on treating the construction of the vast complex 
		the same way they approach the design of pocket-sized electronics.
 
 Apple's in-house construction team enforced many rules: No vents or 
		pipes could be reflected in the glass. Guidelines for the special wood 
		used frequently throughout the building ran to some 30 pages.
 
		
		 
		Tolerances, the distance materials may deviate from desired 
		measurements, were a particular focus. On many projects, the standard is 
		1/8 of an inch at best; Apple often demanded far less, even for hidden 
		surfaces.
 The company's keen design sense enhanced the project, but its 
		expectations sometimes clashed with construction realities, a former 
		architect said.
 
 "With phones, you can build to very, very minute tolerances," he said. 
		"You would never design to that level of tolerance on a building. Your 
		doors would jam."
 
 The project, which generated about 13,000 full-time construction jobs, 
		took a toll on contractors. The original general contractors, Skanska 
		USA and DPR Construction, left after work began, which construction 
		experts called a rare development for a project of such scale. The 
		reasons for the departures are unclear, and neither Apple nor the firms 
		would comment.
 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            The Apple Campus 2 
			is seen under construction in Cupertino, California in this aerial 
			photo taken January 13, 2017. REUTERS/Noah Berger 
            
			 
FAITHFUL TO DESIGN PRINCIPLES
 Apple's novel approach to the building took many forms. Architect German de la 
Torre, who worked on the project, found many of the proportions - such as the 
curve of a rounded corner - came from Apple's products. The elevator buttons 
struck some workers as resembling the iPhone's home button; one former manager 
even likened the toilet's sleek design to the device.
 
 But de la Torre ultimately saw that Apple executives were not trying to evoke 
the iPhone per se, but rather following something akin to the Platonic ideal of 
form and dimension.
 
 "They have arrived at design principles somehow through many years of 
experimentation, and they are faithful to those principles," de la Torre said.
 
 Fanatical attention to detail is a key tenet. Early in construction, Apple 
managers told the construction team that the ceiling - composed of large panels 
of polished concrete - should be immaculate inside and out, just as the inside 
of the iPhone’s audio jack is a finished product, a former construction manager 
recalled.
 
 Thus, each of the thousands of ceiling panels had to win approval from both 
Apple's in-house team and the general contractor, once at the shop and then 
again at the construction site.
 
 "The things you can’t see, they all mattered to Apple,” the former construction 
manager said.
 
 One of the most vexing features was the doorways, which Apple wanted to be 
perfectly flat, with no threshold. The construction team pushed back, but Apple 
held firm.
 
 The rationale? If engineers had to adjust their gait while entering the 
building, they risked distraction from their work, according to a former 
construction manager.
 
 “We spent months trying not to do that because that’s time, money and stuff 
that’s never been done before,” the former construction manager said.
 
 
Time and time again, Apple managers spent months perfecting minute features, 
creating a domino effect that set back other parts of the project, former 
construction managers say.
 Signage required a delicate balancing act: Apple wanted all signs to reflect its 
sleek, minimalist aesthetic, but the fire department needed to ensure the 
building could be swiftly navigated in an emergency.
 
 Dirk Mattern, a retired deputy fire chief who is representing the Santa Clara 
County Fire Department on the project, estimated he attended 15 meetings that 
touched on the topic.
 
 "I’ve never spent so much time on signage," he said.
 
 LIKE A PAINTING
 
 When Apple tapped general contractors Holder Construction and Rudolph & Sletten 
to finish the main building in 2015, one of the first orders of business was 
finalizing a door handle for conference rooms and offices.
 
 After months of back and forth, construction workers presented their work to a 
manager from Apple’s in-house team, who turned the sample over and over in his 
hands. Finally, he said he felt a faint bump.
 
 The construction team double-checked the measurements, unable to find any 
imperfections – down to the nanometer. Still, Apple insisted on another version.
 
 The construction manager who was so intimately involved in the door handle did 
not see its completion. Down to his last day, Apple was still fiddling with the 
design - after a year and a half of debate.
 
 When construction wraps, the only fingerprints on the site will be Jobs'. 
Workers often had to wear gloves to avoid marring the delicate materials, said 
Brett Davis, regional director of the District Council 16 union for painters and 
related crafts.
 
 "It's like a painting that you don't want to touch," he said. "It's definitely 
going to be something to see, if they let you in."
 
 (Editing by Jonathan Weber and Edward Tobin)
 
				 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |