Top Senate Democrat says has 'serious
concerns' about court nominee Gorsuch
Send a link to a friend
[February 08, 2017]
By Susan Cornwell and Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Senate's top
Democrat on Tuesday accused President Donald Trump's Supreme Court pick
of avoiding answering questions "like the plague" and dodging efforts to
gauge his judicial independence during a meeting that deepened his
concerns about the nominee.
Neil Gorsuch, the federal appeals court judge from Colorado who the
Republican president nominated last week to a lifetime job on the high
court, met privately with Senator Chuck Schumer of New York as he
continues to try to build support for his confirmation by the Senate.
"I thought there was a deliberate strategy to duck the hard questions.
And he has an obligation to answer them, not simply to the Senate but to
the American people," Schumer told reporters afterward, referring to
Gorsuch.
Schumer said Gorsuch declined to answer questions such as whether a ban
on Muslim immigration would be constitutional or comment on what is
known as the Emoluments Clause in the U.S. Constitution that bars
officeholders from accepting money from foreign powers.
Supreme Court nominees routinely avoid weighing in on pending legal
disputes they could end up casting a vote on if confirmed to the job.
But Schumer said he was seeking Gorsuch's views on broader principles,
rather than specific cases, that he believed a nominee should be able to
answer.
"The judge today avoided answers like the plague," Schumer told
reporters.
Schumer said Trump is testing the fundamental underpinnings of U.S.
democracy and its institutions.
"These times deserve answers, and Judge Gorsuch did not provide them. I
have serious concerns about this nominee," said Schumer, who added that
he had not yet made up his mind on whether or not to support Gorsuch.
The shorthanded Supreme Court currently has four liberals and four
conservatives, meaning Gorsuch's confirmation would reinstate a
conservative majority.
Trump's fellow Republicans control the Senate 52-48 but Schumer insisted
that Gorsuch would need to win 60 votes, rather than a simple majority,
to move toward confirmation. Democrats can seek to use a procedural
maneuver to block a confirmation vote if Gorsuch's supporters cannot
muster 60 votes, although Republicans could change the Senate rules.
[to top of second column] |
U.S. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) (L) meets with U.S.
Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch (R) in Schumer's office at
the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S. February 7, 2017.
REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY
Schumer's questions to Gorsuch followed Trump's directive to
temporarily ban people from seven Muslim-majority countries and any
refugees from entering the United States. The ban, which Trump said
was needed to protect the United States from Islamist militants, was
suspended by a federal judge, pending an appeal by the Trump
administration.
His questions about the Emoluments Clause come in light of a lawsuit
filed by ethics lawyers accusing Trump of allowing his businesses to
accept payments from foreign governments, which is prohibited under
that constitutional provision.
Democrats argued that it is more important than ever for a Supreme
Court nominee to demonstrate judicial independence, citing Trump's
harsh criticism of federal judges who have issued rulings against
him.
But Republicans belittled Democratic efforts to discredit Gorsuch.
"If they keep working to paint Judge Gorsuch as a mouth-breathing
bald eagle hunter, they'll embarrass themselves," said Republican
Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska, who also met with Gorsuch on Tuesday.
Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah told Reuters the Democratic
questioning of the nominee's potential independence "flies in the
face of everything I know about Judge Gorsuch." Lee described
Gorsuch is "fair, decent, impartial."
(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|