Very
old, charming - er - thing goes on display in Athens
Send a link to a friend
[February 13, 2017]
By Karolina Tagaris
ATHENS (Reuters) - A
bird-like statuette dating back 7,000 years has
mystified archaeologists in Greece who still do not know
exactly what it is, or where it came from.
|
The "7,000-year-old enigma," as it has been dubbed by the
National Archaeological Museum, has been put on display until
March 26 after being brought from the museum's storerooms.
It is the latest item to be presented under the title "The
Unseen Museum" - a reference to the roughly 200,000 antiquities
from statues to gold jewelry and every-day objects in store and
not on daily display.
Carved out of granite, the 36 cm (14 inches) "enigma" statuette
of the late Neolithic era has a pointed nose and long neck
leading to a markedly round belly, flat back and cylindrical
stumpy legs.
"It could depict a human-like figure with a bird-like face, or a
bird-like entity which has nothing to do with man but with the
ideology and symbolism of the Neolithic society," Katya Manteli,
an archaeologist with the museum, told Reuters.
Experts also cannot be sure of its provenance, as it belongs to
a personal collection. They assume only that it is from the
northern Greek regions of Thessaly or Macedonia.
Unlike most Neolithic figurines made of soft stone, it is carved
out of hard rock even though metal tools were not available at
the time.
[to top of second column] |
And while it is too short for a life-size depiction of the human
figure, it is bigger than most Neolithic statues, which are rarely
found over 35 cm tall.
"Regarding technique and size, it is among the rare and unique works
of the Neolithic period in Greece," Manteli said.
More puzzling still is the lack of clear indication of sex. Is it
due to technical sculpting limitations? Or did the sculptor intend
to create an asexual figure. Archaeologists believe the fact that
the statuette is polished suggests the figure is in its final form,
although they maintain that if the sculptor had the appropriate
tools it would have taken a more specific form.
"Yes, it could be a pregnant figure but there are no breasts, used
in Neolithic times to depict the female body. On the other hand it
lacks male organs so it is presented as an asexual figure," Manteli
said.
"There are enigmatic aspects to it which make it charming."
(Additional reporting by Deborah Kyvrikosaios; Editing by Jeremy
Gaunt)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|