Federal
judge dismisses Massachusetts defamation lawsuit against
Cosby
Send a link to a friend
[February 17, 2017]
By Scott Malone
BOSTON (Reuters) - A
federal judge in Massachusetts on Thursday dismissed a
defamation lawsuit against Bill Cosby by an actress who
claimed he raped her, ruling that the comedian acted
within his rights when he proclaimed himself innocent of
the crime.
|
The civil lawsuit is one of a slew of cases brought against
the actor, best known for playing the father in the 1980s
television hit "The Cosby Show," by about 50 women who say he
sexually assaulted them, often after plying them with drugs and
alcohol, in a series of alleged attacks dating back decades.
The vast bulk of the claims are too old to be the subject of a
criminal prosecution, though Cosby is also awaiting trial in
Pennsylvania on charges he sexually assaulted a former
basketball coach at his alma mater, Temple University.
Cosby has denied wrongdoing in all the cases.
U.S. District Judge Mark Mastroianni wrote on Thursday that
accuser Katherine Mae McKee had not demonstrated that Cosby
defamed her simply by denying her claims, made in an interview
with the New York Daily News.
"An accused person cannot be foreclosed ... from considering the
issuance of a simple and unequivocal denial — free from overall
defamatory triggers or contextual themes," Mastroianni wrote.
Cosby built a long career on a family-friendly style of comedy
before being hit by the wave of allegations.
Attorneys for the 79-year-old entertainer welcomed the decision
and compared it to a Pennsylvania court's dismissal of a similar
civil case last month.
"This is the correct outcome," said attorney Angela Agrusa.
"This order, taken in conjunction with the recent decision in
the Hill case, amount to a powerful statement of the law."
[to top of second column] |
However, in his decision, Mastroianni noted there were
differences between the case he was dismissing and a separate
lawsuit before him brought by accuser Tamara Green and since
joined by six other women.
"There is a subtle, yet fundamental, difference between stating
or implying that an accuser's allegations are completely
fabricated (and failing to fully disclose the non-defamatory
facts underlying this assertion), as in Green, and disputing an
accuser's credibility based on fully disclosed non-defamatory
facts, as here," Mastroianni wrote.
An attorney for Green said the decision had no bearing on the
other Massachusetts case.
"Judge Mastroianni's opinion makes it explicitly clear that he
is not backing away from his previous decision in the Green
case," attorney Joseph Cammarata said. "My clients look forward
to their day in court."
(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Alan Crosby and Lisa
Shumaker)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|