Researchers tested two products, the Finis Swimsense and Garmin
Swim, and found them to be comparable to each other and pretty good
at tracking distance, laps and different types of swimming strokes.
Stroke counts were not as consistent, however. And the devices’
ability to recognize different stroke types is likely to vary more
widely with amateur swimmers than with competitive athletes, the
researchers note.
“As part of the so-called ‘quantified self’ movement, individuals
who swim as part of a recreational health and fitness program can
benefit from monitoring some basic indices of their performance,”
said senior study author Gearoid O Laighin of the Center for
Research in Medical Devices at the National University of Ireland in
Galway.
“Swimming ranks amongst the most popular leisure activities
worldwide,” O Laighin told Reuters Health by email. “The general
health benefits of regular swimming are well established and
swimming is one of the few sports that can be enjoyed during all
stages of life.”
O Laighin and colleagues tested the two swim fitness trackers by
following 10 national competitive swimmers — five men and five women
— during 60 laps of swimming. The swimmers wore both activity
monitors while doing intervals of the butterfly, backstroke,
breaststroke and frontcrawl. The devices identified stroke type,
swim distance, lap time, stroke count, stroke rate, stroke length
and average speed. The data was compared against underwater video
recordings for accuracy.
Both devices accurately identified the four swim strokes and
accurately counted swim distance and laps during the middle of an
interval. However, laps performed at the beginning and end of an
interval weren’t always accurate, and stroke count measurements were
off by a few counts in all but two occasions. These small errors
also affect the stroke rate, stroke length and average speed numbers
since they’re based on lap times and stroke counts, the study
authors write in PLoS ONE.
The Garmin Swim correctly identified the four swimming strokes with
95.4 percent overall sensitivity, and the Finis Swimsense was
slightly more sensitive at 96.4 percent. With total distance, the
Garmin tracker was three laps short, all for the frontcrawl stroke.
The Finis tracker registered the correct number of laps but showed
variations within the strokes. Both devices showed errors in lap
times at the beginning of lap intervals.
“It’s great to see researchers dive into the details of the devices,
and the numbers came out well across the board,” said C.J. Fiala,
spokesperson for Finis Swimsense in Livermore, California. “When
creating the product, we wouldn’t accept a large margin of error,
and we believe this is the most accurate it can get.”
[to top of second column] |
In general, both devices overestimated stroke counts in all
intervals except with the butterfly, which the trackers tended to
underestimate. Overall, accuracy was lowest with the breaststroke.
The varying accuracy may be related to stroke technique and how
individual swimmers perform, O Laighin said. The error margin may
likely increase when the trackers are used by recreational swimmers
rather than elite swimmers.
“Although activity trackers have been increasing in popularity, it
has been difficult to measure water-based activities due to
waterproofing issues,” said James Sanders of the Movement Insights
Lab at the National Center for Sport and Exercise Medicine in
Leicestershire, UK, who wasn’t involved with the study.
“These two swimming sensors are highly influenced by technique and
stroke mechanics, so the results should be interpreted with caution
by a recreational swimmer whose technique may be unrefined,” Sanders
told Reuters Health by email.
The Garmin Swim sells for $149.99 and the Finis Swimsense sells for
$179.99. There was no financial assistance from either company for
the study.
Garmin media representatives didn’t return calls or emails
requesting comment.
“Understanding what you’re doing in the water gives you the
opportunity to improve your skills,” Fiala said. “If you have
inaccurate results, you’re not getting a real picture of what you’re
doing and won’t know how to improve.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2kvfxer PLoS ONE, online February 8, 2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|