U.S. appeals court upholds Maryland's ban
on assault rifles
Send a link to a friend
[February 22, 2017]
(Reuters) - A federal appeals court
on Tuesday upheld Maryland's ban on assault rifles, ruling gun owners
are not protected under the U.S. Constitution to possess "weapons of
war," court documents showed.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decided 10-4 that the
Firearm Safety Act of 2013, a law in response to the massacre in
Newtown, Connecticut, by a gunman with an assault rifle, does not
violate the right to bear arms within the Second Amendment.
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protection to
the weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote, referring to the
"military-style rifles" that were also used during mass shootings in
Aurora, Colorado, San Bernardino, California, and Orlando, Florida.
These are "places whose names have become synonymous with the slaughters
that occurred there," he wrote, noting that the Supreme Court's decision
in the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller case excluded coverage of
assault weapons.
The United States has among the most permissive gun rights in the world.
Because the U.S. Congress has long been a graveyard for gun control
legislation, some states and localities have enacted their own measures.
In total, seven states and the District of Columbia have laws that ban
semiautomatic rifles, several of which that have faced various court
challenges as there is a longstanding legal debate over the scope of
Second Amendment rights.
Four appeal courts have rejected Second Amendment challenges to bans on
assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, King wrote.
[to top of second column] |
Assault-style rifles hang on display inside a Dallas, Texas gun
shop, September 13, 2004. REUTERS/Jeff Mitchell JM
In 2015, U.S. District Judge Catherine Blake upheld Maryland's law
that bans the AR-15 and other military-style rifles and shotguns and
limits magazine capacity to 10 rounds, but a smaller panel of
circuit court judges reversed her ruling in 2016. The case could be
eventually be heard by the Supreme Court.
The majority "has gone to greater lengths than any other court to
eviscerate the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear
arms," Judge William Traxler wrote in the dissent of the ruling
released on Tuesday.
(Reporting by Brendan O'Brien in Milwaukee; Editing by Nick Macfie)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|