Sanofi,
Regeneron lose bid to overturn Amgen win in patent case
Send a link to a friend
[January 04, 2017]
By Brendan Pierson
(Reuters) - A federal judge on Tuesday
refused to throw out a court verdict upholding two Amgen Inc patents
related to the company's cholesterol drug, a defeat for Sanofi SA and
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, which make a rival drug.
|
In an October 2014 lawsuit, Amgen had sought to stop Paris-based
Sanofi and Tarrytown, New York-based Regeneron from selling Praluent,
a drug intended to lower bad LDL cholesterol by blocking a protein
known as PCSK9.
Amgen makes a rival drug called Repatha, and it said Praluent
infringed the Thousand Oaks, California-based company's patents
related to the protein. A jury found Amgen's patents valid in March.
Following that verdict, Sanofi and Regeneron moved for U.S. District
Judge Sue Robinson, who is presiding over the case, to overturn the
verdict and order a new trial. She denied that motion on Tuesday.
Regeneron shares were down 2.6 percent in after-hours trading, and
Amgen shares rose 1.6 percent.
"The court's ruling today is an important step in this case and
confirms the jury's finding that the patents which protect Repatha
are valid and infringed by Sanofi," Amgen spokeswoman Kristen Davis
said in an email.
Sanofi spokeswoman Ashleigh Koss said in an email that the company
was disappointed with the ruling.
"It is our longstanding position that Amgen's asserted patent claims
are invalid, and we intend to appeal today's ruling," she said.
Regeneron, which developed Praluent in partnership with Sanofi,
could not immediately be reached for comment.
[to top of second column] |
Damages have yet to be set, and Robinson has not decided whether to
block Sanofi and Regeneron from selling Praluent. The defendants
said after the verdict that they planned to appeal to the U.S.
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, which reviews patent disputes.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Praluent and Repatha
to reduce bad cholesterol in 2015.
The drugs are more costly than other treatments targeting bad
cholesterol, with a list price topping $14,000 annually.
(Reporting by Brendan Pierson in New York; Editing by Dan Grebler
and Richard Chang)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|