U.S. judge extends order halting Texas
fetal remains regulation
Send a link to a friend
[January 05, 2017]
By Jon Herskovitz
AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) - A federal judge
on Wednesday extended until Jan. 27 a restraining order that halted a
new Texas regulation requiring fetal tissue remains to be buried or
cremated to allow for more time to make a ruling.
U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks issued the ruling after hearing two days
of testimony this week on the regulation that Texas contends is aimed at
maintaining the highest standards of human dignity. Abortion rights
groups contend it is an unnecessary and vague regulation aimed at making
abortions more arduous and expensive.
Sparks last month put the regulation on hold before it was to take
effect on Dec. 19. He had previously issued a temporary restraining
order to delay enactment until at least Jan. 6.
Sparks asked the state how the existing law on the disposal of human
remains and dead human bodies would mesh with the proposed regulation
and was told by a lawyer for the state that fetal tissue is not
considered human remains for the purpose of the statute.
"Texas values the dignity of the remains of the unborn and believes that
fetal tissue should be disposed of properly and humanely," Texas
Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, said in a statement. He said
he is confident the state will prevail.
Amy Hagstrom Miller, a plaintiff in the case and president of Whole
Woman's Health, which runs three facilities in Texas, testified that she
believes the regulation would increase costs and could increase the
stigma of an abortion.
"I don't understand how this puts women's health and safety forward,"
she said in court.
The Texas limitations would be more stringent than regulations in almost
every other state, which allow aborted fetal tissue to be disposed of
the same as other human tissue, according to the Guttmacher Institute,
an abortion rights group.
[to top of second column] |
An exam room at the Planned Parenthood South Austin Health Center is
shown following the U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down a
Texas law imposing strict regulations on abortion doctors and
facilities in Austin, Texas, U.S. on June 27, 2016. REUTERS/Ilana
Panich-Linsman/File Phot
The regulation change in Texas was crafted shortly after the state
suffered a stinging defeat at the U.S. Supreme Court last year when
the justices struck down separate abortion restrictions backed by
the state's Republican leaders.
Writing for the court, liberal Justice Stephen Breyer said the
measures imposing strict regulations on doctors and facilities
constituted an undue burden on abortion access and violated the U.S.
Constitution.
(Reporting by Jon Herskovitz; Editing by Tom Brown and Leslie Adler)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|