| 
			
			 The U.S. Food and Drug Administration typically determines what 
			information goes on the labels of medical drugs and devices, after 
			evaluating whether the product is safe and effective for the 
			proposed indication. 
 Drugmakers have long wanted to communicate supplementary information 
			that isn't on the label, but which concerns the cleared use of the 
			product. (http://bit.ly/2jz9dRh)
 
 However, the FDA said it does not consider the supplementary 
			information that is consistent with the FDA-required labeling 
			guidelines alone to be evidence of a new intended use.
 
			
			 
			If a firm communicates information, including on promotional 
			material, that has not been evaluated by the regulator, but appears 
			to be FDA-ratified, then it could lead to misbranding, and could 
			subject firms to enforcement action if the representations or 
			suggestions are considered false or misleading.
 To avert this, the FDA recommended on Wednesday that companies 
			disclose why the additional data is contextually relevant, and 
			divulge limitations related to the study design, methodology.
 
 The guidance is available for comment for about three months, after 
			which the FDA will release its final determinations.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			As of March, Amarin Corp Plc could promote its fish-oil pill for 
			unapproved uses after the FDA decided not to appeal a judge's ruling 
			that the company has the right under the First Amendment to make 
			truthful and non-misleading statements about its products. 
			[nL1N16G20L]
 (Reporting by Divya Grover in Bengaluru; Editing by Martina D'Couto)
 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |