| 
			
			 Successful pregnancies have never been more important at this 
			surrogacy center where every bed is taken following a jump in demand 
			as India inches towards banning commercial surrogacy. 
 These women could be among the last in the country to rent their 
			wombs for money if the Indian parliament passes a bill to outlaw 
			commercial surrogacy - a 15-year-old industry estimated to be worth 
			as much as $2.3 billion annually - in its next session starting in 
			February.
 
 India's surrogacy industry has come under attack by women's rights 
			groups who say fertility clinics are "baby factories" for the rich, 
			and that a lack of regulation results in poor and uneducated women 
			signing contracts they do not fully understand.
 
 Yet some of the women the bill aims to protect are currently queuing 
			up for a last chance to make around 400,000 rupees ($5,900) - money 
			they said they could only dream of otherwise.
 
 Razia Sultana, 32, had an embryo transferred into her uterus in the 
			final week of December.
 
 Until six months ago, she arranged egg donors and surrogates for 
			infertility clinics, making 5,000 rupees for each referral, but 
			decided to become a surrogate herself on the day she first heard 
			about the ban.
 
			
			 
			"My children supported my decision saying bearing a child was better 
			than selling a kidney, which I was considering too," she told the 
			Thomson Reuters Foundation.
 She will stay at the center for nine months, meet her children once 
			a week and only go outside with an escort.
 
 "These are small compromises. I have no other option to make this 
			kind of money."
 
 SLAVERY TO SURROGACY
 
 The Indian government believes the ban will check unethical 
			practices.
 
 "We are concerned about the health of the surrogate mother and that 
			the legal and financial rights of the child are protected," said 
			Manoj Pant from the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
 
 "India wants to be on par with developed and developing nations that 
			do not legitimize commercial surrogacy."
 
 Until the ban on surrogacy passes, India continues to be among a 
			handful of countries where women can be paid to carry another's 
			child through in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. 
			[nL5N1F71H7]
 
 Most women at the Gurugram center are from migrant colonies close to 
			the sweatshops where they once worked.
 
 Ruby Kumari, 35, heard about surrogacy three years ago at the export 
			factory where she worked 12-hour shifts, stitching 50 garments an 
			hour - a target her manager would stretch to 60 or even 70 - and 
			earning 250 rupees a day.
 
 The possibility of earning 400,000 rupees hooked her and she agreed 
			to rent her womb.
 
 "The day I delivered, the child's parents gifted me 50,000 rupees in 
			addition to my fee," Kumari said. "I came back and enrolled my 
			daughter into an English-medium school."
 
			
			 
			Kumari's husband also works in a garment factory and makes 2 rupees 
			for each item he irons. Pregnant with her second surrogate child, 
			Kumari said her family had no future if not for surrogacy.
 Like Kumari, Jayalakshmi Verma is another surrogate who wonders why 
			"gifting motherhood" is wrong and why work that earns her respect 
			and money would be made illegal.
 
 The 28-year-old single mother of three said: "My in-laws threw me 
			out of their house, my manager at the export factory was abusive and 
			I was forced to quit. Here I have got respect for carrying a child."
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			Verma said she will have no choice but to return to the factory if 
			surrogacy is banned. "What other skill do I have?"
 Surrogacy law experts say that if the government wishes to protect 
			poor women from being exploited, it should regulate the sector 
			rather than banning it.
 
 "The surrogacy bill does not make any provision for the protection 
			of women, assuming that banning commercial surrogacy will protect 
			them," said Hari Ramasubramanian of Indian Surrogacy Law Centre.
 
 UNREGULATED BUSINESS
 
 At the Gurugram center, owner Sarita Sharma read out the 
			requirements for an egg donor to a staff member: "Fair complexion, B 
			positive."
 
			Within seconds, a picture of a fair young woman smiling into the 
			camera flashes up on her phone and she quickly alerts the clinic. 
			Women receive 35,000 rupees for each donation.
 "Business is brisk," said Sharma, who has been arranging donors and 
			surrogates for the last decade using a wide network of agents in 
			migrant colonies.
 
 She said demand for her 1 million rupee pregnancy packages - 
			covering the surrogate's fee, food, accommodation and hospital 
			expenses - has shot up. "I have about 1,000 women registered with 
			us," Sharma said.
 
 Yet as demand soars, so do concerns.
 
 As part of a study on infertility clinics in New Delhi, sociologist 
			Tulsi Patel from the Delhi School of Economics found poor awareness 
			among women about the health complications and risks that repeated 
			egg donations and pregnancies can cause.
 
			
			 
			The study also found that in some cases, clinics would transfer more 
			than the permissible number of three embryos into the uterus to 
			better the chances of pregnancy.
 "But we did not find a single case of a woman forced into 
			surrogacy," Patel said.
 
 Experts fear the ban may push the industry underground, making women 
			offering surrogacy services only more vulnerable to health risks.
 
 For now, the last surrogates still hope to realize their dreams. "I 
			want to start my own beauty parlor," said Jyoti Pal, 24, a single 
			mother who is now four months pregnant.
 
 "And I will do it again if possible."
 
 ($1=68.01 Indian rupees)
 
 (Reporting by Roli Srivastava; Editing by Ed Upright. Please credit 
			Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, 
			that covers humanitarian news, women’s rights, trafficking, property 
			rights, climate change and resilience. Visit news.trust.org)
 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |