|
 The health insurers, including Independence Blue Cross and Molina
Healthcare Inc, are also recommending ways to put more control over
insurance in the hands of states as the federal oversight of
Obamacare is dismantled. They emphasize that it is crucial to keep
government subsidies for low income people.
These changes, described by executives, high level officials in the
health insurance sector and lawmakers in nearly a dozen interviews
with Reuters, include pushing for more strict enforcement of
eligibility for these plans.
Because Republicans are just starting to work with the new Trump
administration and the debate is fluid, it is not clear ultimately
what changes will take hold. But some of these ideas have started to
surface in early Republican legislation, such as a co-sponsored bill
from Maine Senator Susan Collins that would keep subsidies.
The moves underscore that private insurers are quietly working on
how to benefit under the Trump administration, which is focusing on
deregulation in healthcare, energy and manufacturing. And they show
that insurers want to save aspects of Obamacare individual plans,
but cut down on the risk to their own bottom lines and any hikes in
premiums that threaten the viability of this insurance market.
This market for individual insurance covers about 10 million people
and is small compared to the employer-based system that covers more
than 160 million Americans and the government-paid programs for over
120 million people.
But it is one that insurers have described as having growth
potential. While Obamacare cut the uninsured rate to 11 percent,
there are still millions of uninsured Americans. The largest U.S.
insurer UnitedHealth Group Inc told investors recently that it sees
opportunities in new state-based markets and is talking to
policymakers.
Many investors believe that the Republican deregulation push with
Trump will benefit insurers.
"Clearly they support the private insurers and the role that they
are going to play in any sort of new market," said Jeff Jonas, a
portfolio manager at Gamco Investors in Rye, New York, which he said
owns the publicly traded insurers.
INFLUENCING WHAT "REPLACE" LOOKS LIKE
President Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to repeal Obama’s
national healthcare law on his first day in office. He and
Republicans have not presented an agreed upon replacement plan, but
key issues they are expected to address include the law's
requirements for individuals to have insurance.
Insurers' main “ask” takes into account replacement plans under
discussion in Congress, and largely assumes that government funds
will continue to subsidize health benefits, at least for the next
two to three years.
Daniel Hilferty, CEO of Independence Blue Cross in Pennsylvania,
told Reuters that he advocated tightening the rules around signing
up for insurance outside of the open enrollment period, and tight
control of which third parties are allowed to pay premiums for
patients.
Independence is part of a nationwide network of Blue Cross Blue
Shield licensees such as Anthem Inc and has enrolled more than
300,000 consumers in individual plans.
Hilferty's requests, echoed by other people in the industry who did
not want to be named, are similar to demands the industry made of
Obama. Enrollment outside of the regular period - and third-party
groups that keep poorer, sicker patients in the private market by
paying their premiums - has helped lead to hundreds of millions of
dollars in losses for insurers and pushed three of the nation’s
largest players out of the Obamacare market.
[to top of second column] |
In addition, Independence is also asking for a bigger role in
signing up new customers who want to buy individual plans. Insurers
sell plans both on the exchanges and off the exchanges, but
subsidized plans are currently mostly sold on the government run
HealthCare.gov and on state-run websites in a dozen states.
"It would be really helpful if we in the industry played a more
significant role in the actual enrollment process," Hilferty said.
Trump signed an executive order on Friday directing the federal
government to scale back regulations, taxes and penalties related to
the law. But the directive did not change the priorities outlined to
Reuters by the insurers and industry sources, they said.
FOCUS ON THE MANDATE, COST SHARING
Insurers have built their list of top priorities assuming in part
that Republicans will try to overturn the existing individual
mandate, which requires Americans to pay a fee if they do not have
insurance. A replacement plan would need to include some type of
bonus to entice healthy people to get insurance.
That, they say, would be a step towards a good mix of sick and
healthy people that will keep the plans profitable. Ideas include
creating high-risk pools to keep the very sick in a separate market
and offering low prices to the young and healthy.
Without a punishment for not buying insurance that is like the
individual mandate, the market can't survive, according to Dr. J.
Mario Molina, Chief Executive Officer of Molina Healthcare Inc, a
company that provides Medicaid for the poor and individual insurance
plans on the exchanges.
“It probably needs to be a combination of both an incentive and a
penalty,” Molina said.
Insurers also want to keep the cost-sharing subsidies that have made
healthcare costs affordable for millions of people as well as the
premium subsidies that help to reduce the monthly cost for people
with low incomes. Those subsidies are part of a court case filed
last year that is on hold.
"If it's free or close to free, you are more likely to sign up in
the absence of the mandate," said Dan Mendelson, CEO of Avalere
Health, a research group and consultant that advises health insurers
and is part of Inovalon Holdings.
Insurers also want continued premium subsidies, skewed to keep up
enrollment of younger people.
"I think if you don't have the subsidies, then the whole thing falls
apart," said Molina.
(Reporting by Caroline Humer; additional reporting by Susan Cornwell
in Washington D.C.; editing by Edward Tobin)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
