Child pedestrian safety initiatives, such as the Safe Routes to
School program, tend to focus on schools, but traffic risks around
parks deserve more attention, the study authors write in Injury
Prevention.
“Fatalities and injuries in our transportation system, especially
vulnerable ones such as children and pedestrians, are a vitally
important and soluble issue, yet we treat them as the price of doing
business,” said lead author Nick Ferenchak, a civil engineer at the
University of Colorado in Denver.
In the United States, motor vehicle collisions are the leading cause
of death for young people between the ages of 5 and 24 years,
according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Every
hour, about 40 children die on roads around the world, many on foot,
according to the World Health Organization.
“We need to stop our practice of thinking myopically by focusing
just around schools and start thinking about how we make our entire
cities safer,” Ferenchak told Reuters Health by email. “This is not
just a transportation issue but a planning/land use issue as well.”
Ferenchak and a coauthor looked at National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration data on crashes in six cities between 1982 and 2012
for children under age 18 to identify where fatalities typically
occur. Then they used GIS mapping to evaluate the quarter-mile
surrounding parks to compare fatality rates to those around schools
and the city as a whole.
They focused on the country’s fastest-growing regions - the South
and the West - and the cities there with the largest proportionate
increases in population, on the theory that new infrastructure could
affect the way schools, parks and trails are included in
communities.
The analysis included Austin, Dallas and Houston in Texas;
Charlotte, North Carolina; Denver and Los Angeles, and in all six
cities, fatality risk around parks was found to be 1.16 to 1.81
times that of the city overall.
Researchers also found that fatalities near parks were 1.04 to 2.23
times more common compared to the vicinity of schools, with Dallas
showing the biggest difference.
“This comes at a critically important time when we’re seeing changes
in U.S. transportation funding and a changing menu of options that
states can choose from,” said Charles DiMaggio, an director of
injury research at the New York University School of Medicine, who
was not involved with the study.
[to top of second column] |
“We know that enforcement and education are important, but
engineering is the most expensive and effective way to protect
kids,” he told Reuters Health by email. “We need, more than
anything, to evaluate all of these efforts.”
One limitation of the study, the researchers acknowledge, is that
specific child pedestrian exposure numbers are hard to track
accurately by geographic area. They are likely to vary by age, and
may vary by city.
“If you’re 5 years old, you’re likely not far from home if you get
injured,” DiMaggio said. “But if you’re 14 or 15, you’re roaming
more widely, which is tough to measure.”
The study team suggests that solutions to the problem lie in the
realms of transportation and urban design. Just as reduced speed
limits and pedestrian crossings in school zones have lowered child
pedestrian injury rates, similar transportation measures around
parks could reduce fatalities.
However, that won’t help in areas with major highways. In several
cities studied, parks were often located near roads with four or six
lanes and speeds above 70 miles per hour, Ferenchak noted. Instead,
parks should be placed on slow, narrow roads in neighborhoods.
“Although I talk about expanding our considerations beyond schools,
that is not a slight at the research being done around schools in
the least,” he said. “We’d like to build collaborations with Safe
Routes to School because they have many important findings and best
practices that could be applied in parks as well.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2ktP6Fw Injury Prevention, online January 10,
2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|