Silicon Valley puts money and muscle into
fighting Trump immigrant curbs
Send a link to a friend
[January 30, 2017]
By Julia Love and Stephen Nellis
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Silicon Valley
took the lead over the weekend in corporate resistance to President
Donald Trump's clampdown on immigration, financing legal opposition,
criticizing the plan, as well as helping employees ensnared by his
executive order.
In an industry that has long depended on immigrants and celebrated their
contributions - as well as championing liberal causes such as gay rights
- there was little initial consensus on exactly how to respond to
Trump's move on Friday.
But, while most in the tech industry stopped short of directly
criticizing the new Republican president, they went much further than
their counterparts in other sectors, who were mostly silent over the
weekend. Most of the major U.S. banks and auto companies, for example,
declined to comment in response to Reuters inquiries.
Trump ordered a temporary ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority
countries and a 120-day halt to refugee resettlement. The action
triggered a global backlash, and sowed confusion and anger after
immigrants, refugees and visitors were kept off flights and left
stranded in airports.
Bigger companies such as Apple Inc <AAPL.O>, Google <GOOGL.O> and
Microsoft Corp <MSFT.O> offered legal aid to employees affected by the
order, according to letters sent to staff. Several Silicon Valley
executives donated to legal efforts to support immigrants facing the
ban.
And Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk and Uber head Travis Kalanick both
said on Twitter that they would take industry concerns about immigration
to Trump’s business advisory council, where they serve.
Kalanick has faced opposition on social media for agreeing to be part of
the advisory group. Kalanick in a Facebook post on Sunday called the
immigration ban "wrong and unjust" and said that Uber would create a $3
million fund to help drivers with immigration issues.
Among those affected by the ban was Khash Sajadi, the British-Iranian
chief executive of San Francisco-based tech company Cloud 66, who was
stuck in London. Like many tech workers, he holds an H1B visa, which
enables foreigners with special expertise to work for U.S. companies.
Sajadi said he hoped big tech companies such as Google and Facebook
would take legal action to protect affected employees. That could help
set a precedent for people in similar situations - but at smaller
companies.
"Ultimately, I think them simply speaking up is not going to move the
needle with people" who are not wealthy and do not live on the East or
West Coasts, he said.
'TECH AGAINST TRUMP' PROTEST
The response from tech companies has been “as forceful as it possibly
can be,” said Eric Talley, a corporate law professor at Columbia Law
School.
“One of the difficult aspects of reaction to the Trump administration in
its first couple of weeks is trying to balance the interest of
expressing legitimate concern ... against the potential cost of being
out too far ahead of everyone else,” he said.
The tech industry also has other issues where it may find itself opposed
to Trump, including trade policy and cyber security.
The president of Mountain View, California-based startup incubator Y
Combinator, Sam Altman, wrote a widely read blog post urging tech
leaders to band together against the immigration order. He said he has
spoken with a variety of people about organizing but remains unsure
about the best course of action.
“The honest answer is we don’t know yet,” he said. “We are talking with
legal groups and tech groups, but this is so unprecedented that I don’t
think anyone has a manual.”
[to top of second column] |
Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk in Hong Kong, China January 26,
2016. REUTERS/Bobby Yip
At Lyft, co-founders John Zimmer and Logan Green pledged on the
company’s blog to donate a million dollars over the next four years to
the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which won a temporary stay of
part of Trump's executive order on Saturday night.
Slack collaboration service co-founder Stewart Butterfield and Union
Square Ventures partners Albert Wenger and Fred Wilson promised to match
contributions to the ACLU.
Michael Dearing, founder of venture capital firm Harrison Metal, started
an effort called Project ELLIS, short for Entrepreneurs' Liberty Link in
Silicon Valley, to help startups and smaller tech companies with
immigration issues. "ELLIS" is a also a reference to New York Harbor's
Ellis Island, where millions of immigrants arrived.
In less than a day, the group has handled two cases, he said.
Dearing said the idea was to "get people in touch quickly with the ...
resources they would have access to if they were in a Google or an Apple
or a Microsoft.”
Dave McClure, the founding partner of 500 Startups and an outspoken
critic of Trump, said his venture capital firm will soon open its first
fund in the Middle East and will shift its attention to supporting
entrepreneurs in their native countries, if bringing them to the United
States proves impossible.
“Investing in entrepreneurs in other countries is probably one of the
best things we can do to promote international awareness and
understanding,” he said.
Rank-and-file employees were already prodding executives to go further
over the weekend.
Shortly after learning of Trump’s order, Brad Taylor, a 37-year-old
engineer for web analytics firm Optimizely, began organizing “Tech
Against Trump,” a protest scheduled to take place on March 14.
In addition to holding a rally in Palo Alto, California, organizers of
the event were urging tech workers at companies that have remained
silent on Trump to walk out of their offices.
Taylor said he was heartened by tech leaders’ statements over the
weekend but wants to see the industry go further.
“The purpose of this is not to be against tech, but to urge them to be
on the right side of history,” he said.
(Writing by Jonathan Weber and Peter Henderson; Editing by Jonathan
Oatis and Mary Milliken)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |