Major tech firms urge U.S.
to retain net neutrality rules
Send a link to a friend
[July 17, 2017]
By David Shepardson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A group representing
major technology firms including Alphabet Inc and Facebook Inc urged the
U.S. Federal Communications Commission on Monday to abandon plans to
reverse the landmark 2015 rules barring internet service providers from
blocking or slowing consumer access to web content.
The Internet Association said in its filing with the FCC that
dismantling the net neutrality rules "will create significant
uncertainty in the market and upset the careful balance that has led to
the current virtuous circle of innovation in the broadband ecosystem."
The rollback will harm consumers, said the group, which also represents
Amazon.com Inc <AMZN.O>, Microsoft Inc <MSFT.O>, Netflix Inc <NFLX.O>,
Twitter Inc <TWTR.N> and Snap Inc <SNAP.N>.
In May, the FCC voted 2-1 to advance Republican FCC Chairman Ajit Pai's
plan to reverse the former Obama administration's order reclassifying
internet service providers as if they were utilities.
Pai has asked if the FCC has authority or should keep its rules barring
internet companies from blocking, throttling or giving "fast lanes" to
some websites, known as "paid prioritization."
Pai, who argues the Obama order was unnecessary and harms jobs and
investment, has not committed to retaining any rules, but said he favors
an "open internet."
The Internet Association said there was "no reliable evidence" provider
investment had fallen.
More than 8.3 million public comments have been filed on the proposal.
Pai will face questions on Wednesday on the issue at a U.S. Senate
hearing.
[to top of second column] |
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) logo is seen before the
FCC Net Neutrality hearing in Washington February 26, 2015.
REUTERS/Yuri Gripas
Broadband providers AT&T Inc, Verizon Communications Inc and Comcast Corp
opposed the 2015 order, saying it discouraged investment and innovation.
Providers say they strongly support open internet rules and will not block or
throttle legal websites even without legal requirements. They separately plan to
file comments with the FCC on Monday.
But some providers have said paid prioritization may make sense at times, citing
self-driving cars and healthcare information.
Internet firms say opening the door to prioritization could enable providers to
"destroy the open nature of the internet that allows new or smaller streaming
video providers to compete with larger or better-funded edge providers."
Internet providers want Congress to resolve the decade-old dispute and pass open
internet protections, but narrowly tailor rules to exclude a future FCC from
imposing rate regulations.
The Internet Association said it was "open to alternative legal bases for the
rules, either via legislative action codifying the existing net neutrality rules
or via sound legal theories offered by the commission."
But it said Pai's proposal "offers no clear alternatives."
(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Peter Cooney)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |