Takata's bankruptcy to pit automakers
against air bag victims
Send a link to a friend
[July 17, 2017]
By Tom Hals and Tina Bellon
WILMINGTON, Del./NEW YORK (Reuters) - The
global recall of Takata Corp's defective air bags widened last week and
the number of confirmed deaths rose, but legal experts said the bigger
worry for car companies caught in the fallout is playing out in a
Delaware bankruptcy courtroom.
Earlier this month, people injured by the air bags, which degrade over
time and can inflate with excessive force, were appointed to their own
official committee in the Japanese company's U.S. bankruptcy, giving
them a powerful voice in the proceedings.
This unusual committee, which includes people whose cars lost value due
to the recall, will be pitted against Honda Motor Co, Toyota Motor Corp
, and other automakers.
The car companies have been trying to use the bankruptcy to limit their
liability for installing the faulty air bags, said Kevin Dean, a Motley
Rice attorney who represents injured drivers on the committee.
Because the committee has official status, Takata must provide it with
funds which can be used to investigate the automakers' liability or to
challenge financial assumptions. Without a committee, plaintiffs'
lawyers would typically have to pay for that themselves.
“If I were a plaintiffs’ lawyer, this would be a golden goose for me,”
said John Pottow, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School,
of the appointment of the special committee.
Takata, Honda, Toyota and General Motors Co declined to comment. Other
carmakers did not return requests for comment.
Bankruptcies typically only have one official creditors committee. In
the Takata case, the committee of injured drivers will sit alongside
another made up of suppliers and vendors, who are likely more interested
in the future of the business than compensation disputes, according to
bankruptcy attorneys who are not involved in the case.
Both committees were appointed by the U.S. Trustee's Office, the arm of
the U.S. Department of Justice that acts as a bankruptcy watchdog.
Seventeen fatalities, including one confirmed last week, and at least
180 injuries have been tied to Takata's air bags since at least 2009.
Last week, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration widened a
global recall of the airbags, which regulators expect to ultimately
cover 69 million cars and 125 million inflators. Most defective air bags
have not been replaced.
In January, Takata entered a settlement with the U.S. Department of
Justice, setting aside $125 million to compensate consumers and $850
million in restitution for automakers.
COMPENSATION FUND
Facing up to $50 billion in liability, Takata filed for bankruptcy in
June in Japan and the United States with a plan to sell its non-air bag
operations for $1.6 billion to Key Safety Systems, which is owned by
China's Ningbo Joyson Electronic Corp. Its air bag business would
continue to make replacements for the 125 million recalled inflators.
[to top of second column] |
A woman stands next to a logo of Takata Corp at a showroom for
vehicles in Tokyo, Japan, November 6, 2015. REUTERS/Toru Hanai/File
Photo
Takata said in its Chapter 11 filings that it will create a fund to
compensate future injuries stemming from the air bags.
Companies that wind up bankrupt due to faulty products often set up
such funds, and gather contributions from insurers and other
potentially liable parties, who in return get shielded from ongoing
litigation.
Similar funds were set up in and the 1985 bankruptcy of A.H. Robins
Co, which sold Dalkon Shield contraceptive devices and the 1995
bankruptcy of Dow Corning, the maker of silicone breast implants.
A $161 million fund in the 2012 bankruptcy of Blitz U.S.A. Inc,
which made red plastic gas containers, included $23 million from
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. In return, the retailer was protected from
lawsuits that alleged it knowingly sold defective gas cans.
Automakers would likely demand similar legal protections in return
for contributing to a Takata fund, and the committee will likely
hire experts to challenge those proposals, bankruptcy experts said.
The committee's lawyers will probably also want to investigate what
car companies knew about the air bags to help determine their
liability and their contributions, the experts said.
“If I were an injured person, I wouldn’t want Takata or the
carmakers to decide on the size of the fund,” said Steven Todd
Brown, a professor at the University at Buffalo School of Law who
specializes in compensation funds.
Some experts said they expected the parties to avoid protracted
legal battles which have marred other product liability bankruptcies
like those involving asbestos.
Pottow, at the University of Michigan Law School, cautioned that may
not be so simple.
“We’re in pretty novel terrain here, given the amount of parties and
the recall involved.”
(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware and Tina Bellon in
New York; Editing by Noeleen Walder and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |