|
 Many of the reasons for those high
taxes are known – too many local governments, executive pay for local
administrators and rising pension costs.
What taxpayers don’t know is that local school districts have billions in debt,
which drives up property taxes even further.
School districts across Illinois owe nearly $21 billion in long-term debt.
That’s an increase of over 67 percent since 2002, when debt equaled $12.3
billion. School debt grew at nearly double the rate of inflation over the
2002-2015 period.
Illinoisans have had to shoulder this debt growth through higher property tax
bills.
Not all these school districts are issuing debt to accommodate masses of new
students. Student enrollment across the state has remained essentially flat over
the past decade and a half, according to data from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Current debt approval processes have
made it too easy for districts to spend beyond their means to upgrade facilities
and fund daily operations.
 The school debt approval process has many flaws. Referendums to approve debt do
not provide essential information to voters. And these referendums occur on
elections known for low voter turnout.
These flaws must be addressed in order to rein in school spending.
ILLINOIS’ SCHOOL DEBT IS HIGHER THAN NATIONAL AVERAGE AND MOST NEIGHBORING
STATES
According to U.S. Census data, Illinois’ school district debt has risen
dramatically over the past decade and a half.
Average debt per student was just $6,000 in 2002. By 2015, it had grown to more
than $10,000 per student, a 68 percent increase – again, double the rate of
inflation. Illinois’ debt per student
is the 11th highest of any state in the nation. It is almost 15 percent higher
than the national average of $8,764.
And it’s far higher compared to most of Illinois’ neighboring states.
Illinois school districts out-borrow their neighbors by a significant margin,
with the exception of Indiana. Illinois’ per student debt is 76 percent higher
than Wisconsin, almost 40 percent higher than Iowa, almost 30 percent higher
than Missouri and 23 percent higher than Kentucky.
SCHOOL DISTRICTS ISSUE DEBT TO BUILD NEW SCHOOLS, FUND DAILY OPERATIONS, MUCH
MORE
Some of the largest debt issuances are to build new schools or update existing
ones. For example, Hall HSD 502, in Spring Valley, took out $32 million in bonds
to build a new high school in 2013.
Others have issued debt to access cash for daily operations. In 2008, Aurora
East USD 131 took out $32 million with a promise to “cover operational costs and
balance the budget by 2010.”
That new debt ended up costing local taxpayers. Aurora residents with homes
valued at $100,000 ended up paying an extra $117 in property taxes each year.
Debt is necessary for major projects, and most school district debt issuances to
build a new school or improve existing facilities are authorized through local
referendums, meaning voters have to approve these measures.
LOW VOTER TURNOUT, VAGUE REFERENDUM WORDING MAKE DEBT APPROVAL EASY TO
MANIPULATE
Nearly 40 percent of school district debt or tax referendums in Illinois were
placed on the ballots of local elections between 2006 and 2015.
Local elections are known for low turnout. The statewide April 7, 2015 local
elections – for municipal mayors, village presidents, councilmen, aldermen and
many other important local positions – saw roughly 81 percent of registered
voters stay home, for example.
Low voter turnout makes it easier for special interest groups to dominate
elections.
These referendums only require a simple majority vote to pass. The referendum
Hall HSD 502 pushed for a new school passed by mere three votes – 1,717 to 1,714
– compared to their population of over 9,500.
In addition, local taxpayers sometimes know little about what they’re voting for
because the language used in referendums can be vague. Usually only the amount
of the original bond amount is cited – not the total cost, which would include
interest payments and issuance costs too.
The description of why the bond is being issued is often vague as well. For
example, Ford Heights SD 469 issued a referendum for an $11 million bond with
the cryptic description of “for the purpose of paying claims.”
Illinois shouldn’t allow proponents of additional spending and debt to take
advantage of low voter turnout in local elections, especially when many
districts already have debt several times higher than the state average.
New debt is too important and costly an issue for such a limited number of
taxpayers to authorize, especially when they are often not provided with enough
information to make a fully informed decision.
SOME DISTRICTS BORROW MORE THAN OTHERS
According to Freedom of Information Act data from the Illinois State Board of
Education, the district with the highest debt per student is Hall HSD 502, in
Spring Valley, with $95,666 per student – almost 10 times the state average.
The district’s debt is the result of building a new $32 million,
134,000-square-foot campus for the area’s 371 students to replace the district’s
100-year-old high school building.
[to top of second column] |
In addition, the Hall
High School board of education approved another $1 million in bonds
earlier this year. This additional debt will raise the property
taxes of a $100,000 home by another $120.
Ford Heights SD 169 also makes the list of the districts with the
highest debt per student. The district has over $20 million in debt
for its 387 students. That’s $51,000 of debt per student. Ford
Heights also has the highest property taxes in Cook County.
Ford Heights has a history of fiscal mismanagement, which has
resulted in a debate over district consolidation and legislative
action to do just that.
SCHOOL DEBT VARIES ACROSS THE STATE
While school debt is an issue statewide, per-student debt varies
widely depending on the region.
Chicago leads the pack with almost $20,000 in debt per student.
Illinois’ collar counties have just half the debt level per student
when compared to Chicago, while the debt per student downstate is
just 40 percent of Chicago’s.
CPS is set to increase its short-term borrowings by $275 million to
pay for a part of its annual teacher pension costs. This latest
borrowing comes on top of $7 billion in general long-term debt. (In
addition, the district has a $10 billion pension shortfall).
Chicago’s school district has gotten itself into a financial mess
after decades of mismanagement, skipped pension payments,
irresponsible borrowing and unaffordable teachers contracts.
The district’s crises are self-inflicted, yet CPS officials continue
to demand an annual bailout from state taxpayers.
DEBT LIMITS
School districts are limited in how much debt they can accumulate.
Their limits are calculated as a percentage of the equalized
assessed value (basically, the property amount used to calculate
local property taxes) in the district – 6.9 percent in elementary
school and high school districts and 13.8 percent in full K-12
districts.
Across the state, 72 districts have exceeded their allowed debt
limit. Collectively, they owe nearly $1 billion more than the school
code originally allows them.
Some school districts have used referendums to go into debt over the
allowed limit. Others, such as Oswego CUSD 308, use special
legislative measures in addition to a referendum to take out debt
that exceeds their limit.
Legislation passed in 2007 allowed CUSD 308 to issue up to $450
million in bonds. The district now has almost $370 million in debt,
or $21,600 per student. That’s $137 million over its original limit.
This legislation allowed other districts to increase their debt by
various amounts as well.
In all, nearly 5 percent of the state’s total school debt has been
issued above prescribed limits.
IMPROVING SCHOOL DEBT TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY
The current rules that govern school district debt do not provide
enough limitations, transparency or taxpayer involvement.
School districts should be required to pay back debt within 20 years
instead of the 25 or even 30 years allowed now. Spreading debt out
across more than 20 years impacts multiple generations and
artificially hides the true cost of borrowing from taxpayers.
In addition, districts that exceed their debt limit should be
restricted from issuing additional debt until they fall below their
original limit.
Debt transparency should be improved by providing more information
to taxpayers before they vote to authorize a bond.
Referendum language should include a detailed description of the
project for which debt is being issued.
In addition, the total debt service proposed in a referendum should
include all costs associated with the debt – the principal, interest
and debt issuance costs. An estimate of the average annual property
tax increase needed to pay the total debt service of the bond should
be provided as well
Those requirements would give local taxpayers a far better idea a
proposed bond’s full impact on their wallets.
Lawmakers such as state Rep. Jeanne Ives, R-Wheaton, and state Rep.
Lou Lang, D-Skokie, have recently introduced different bills that
include the above reforms.
In addition, referendum rules should be changed so special interest
groups cannot dominate votes as easily.
Large bond issuances should only be allowed on the ballot during
general elections – when participation is higher and special
interests cannot easily influence the vote.
And any referendums issuing new debt that exceed a district’s debt
limit should require a three-fifths majority to pass instead of a
simple majority of votes.
Debt is a necessary tool for schools to pay for major projects. But
the mountain of debt school districts have managed to amass over the
past decade and a half is neither necessary nor healthy.
Enacting the above reforms would be a good start to getting
Illinois’ school district debt under control.
And it would help reduce the burden on Illinoisans paying the
nation’s highest property taxes.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|
