Minnesota mystery: Why were cameras off
during police shooting?
Send a link to a friend
[July 19, 2017]
By Chris Kenning
(Reuters) - Amid public outrage over the
fatal shooting of an Australian woman by Minneapolis police, the most
persistent question was why officers did not turn on body cameras that
could have captured what happened.
Experts on police procedure said the most common reasons for failure to
turn on cameras nationally were officers' forgetting or getting caught
by surprise, not trying to hide something. The American Civil Liberties
Union said the case showed a need for better compliance and training.
Justine Damond, who was originally from Sydney, was shot around midnight
on Saturday by an officer responding to an emergency call she had placed
about a possible assault behind her house in a quiet residential
neighborhood.
Authorities said the officer shot the 40-year-old woman through the
window as she approached his patrol car. Neither the officer's body
camera nor a dashboard camera were turned on, depriving authorities of
potential evidence.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73576/735769edf7317a968fdbbfbf634e4e5f270a3c63" alt=""
"There's a knee jerk assumption that something nefarious is occurring"
when cameras are not turned on, said spokesman Steve Tuttle of Axon
Enterprise Inc, a leading maker of body cameras formerly called Taser
International and the manufacturer of the equipment used in Minneapolis.
Malfunctions are rare, but when police are facing lethal danger, an
officer is "not going to call time out" to turn on the camera, he said.
Officers currently must press a button to enable the cameras to record
video and audio, and Axon will soon release a sensor that will trigger
cameras to turn on when a gun is taken from its holster, he said.
The Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, which reviews shootings
involving the police in Minneapolis, is seeking any civilian video of
the incident. It said the officer who shot Damond, who has been
identified Mohamed Noor, and the officer in the patrol car with him,
Matthew Harrity, have been placed on administrative leave.
Police have declined comment on questions about the cameras, pending an
investigation. The lack of video footage has led the city's mayor to
call for a probe, while the American Civil Liberties Union suggested the
police violated policy by failing to switch on the cameras.
Advocates said that when used, cameras protect both officers and the
public and in some cases have reduced use of force and complaints
against police.
"They should be on, every time," said Steve Soboroff, a member of the
Los Angeles Police Commission. Rigorous training and accountability is
needed to ensure compliance, especially when police officers are under
pressure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72d77/72d770e9d425fd3832856fdf9ab46f6619475801" alt=""
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cb801/cb80119d43180ad8d445981995c523738a9f79ae" alt=""
Don Damond is comforted by his son Zach Damond as he speaks to the
media about his fiance, Justine Damond who was fatally shot by
Minneapolis police in Minneapolis, Minnesota. REUTERS/Adam Bettcher
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1404c/1404cc5cca9fbad1103c224445aced88e5394f59" alt=""
USE CAMERAS 'WHEN SAFE,' GUIDELINES SAY
The technology has been adopted by police departments across the
country since 2014 after a police shooting of a Missouri teenager
sparked nationwide demonstrations over police treatment of
minorities. Video evidence might have clarified whether the officer
involved in that incident was justified in the shooting.
Minneapolis rolled out cameras late last year, and the department
adopted guidelines calling for officers to activate them "when safe"
in a variety of situations including traffic stops, emergency
responses, vehicle pursuits, searches and before any use of force or
contact with citizens.
There is only spotty national evidence available about how
frequently police fail to turn on cameras. An Arizona State
University study in 2014 found fewer than half of police incidents
in Phoenix were recorded.
At least 14 people were killed by officers wearing body cams that
were either not turned on or inoperative since 2014, the ACLU said
in December. Even so, that was a tiny fraction of police-involved
shootings.
Jim Pasco, a senior adviser with the Fraternal Order of Police, said
non-compliance among police is not widespread, and a Pew Research
Center report earlier this year found 66 percent of police supported
the use of body cameras.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84585/8458566c0d4fe444e3bbed0479419e0629d79f7e" alt=""
ACLU analyst Jay Stanley pointed to a KSTP-TV report based on
Minneapolis police data showing officers on average uploaded no more
than 6.1 hours of camera footage in March.
The department on Tuesday said the data was part of a study under
way and that no conclusions had been reached.
Despite legitimate circumstances when police cannot turn on cameras,
the Minneapolis shooting illustrates the need to boost training and
compliance.
"Training is critical," said Samuel Walker, a professor emeritus of
criminal justice at the University of Omaha. "This is a relatively
new experiment, and there is a learning curve."
(Reporting by Chris Kenning in Chicago,; additional reporting by
Eric Johnson in Seattle; Editing by Frank McGurty and Cynthia
Osterman)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |