U.S., China talks seen offering
small-scale market access deals
Send a link to a friend
[July 19, 2017]
By David Lawder
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. and Chinese
officials will try to ease trade tensions and bridge differences on
Wednesday in annual economic talks that trade experts say will likely
yield some small-scale agreements to grant U.S. firms more access to
some of China's markets.
But the talks are not expected to solve larger problems, such as U.S.
complaints about China's excess capacity in steel and aluminum and
subsidies for state-owned enterprises, nor China's complaints about U.S.
refusals to sell Beijing advanced technology products.
"What I think we will see is an attempt by both sides to be able to
declare victory by coming up with a few very specific areas in which
China agrees to open up its markets more and which the U.S. can claim as
victories," said Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell
University and a former China division chief at the International
Monetary Fund.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Commerce Secretary Wilbur
Ross said on Tuesday they would be looking for China to agree to
concrete steps with specific delivery dates to open markets, including
more access for U.S. firms in the financial services sector.
The talks, rebranded by the Trump administration as the "U.S.-China
Comprehensive Economic Dialogue," come at the end of a 100-day effort by
the two countries to craft an economic plan aimed at reducing the U.S.
goods trade deficit with China, a gap that reached $347 billion last
year and was up 5.3 percent through May this year.
China agreed in May to resume purchases of U.S. beef for the first time
in 14 years and made commitments to buy U.S. liquefied natural gas and
allow U.S. card payment services companies to operate in China. But
while U.S. beef is now available in Chinese shops, it has taken longer
for the other promised steps to be implemented.
Chinese Vice-Premier Wang Yang said on Tuesday that China has some
concerns of its own to air at the talks, including "outdated" U.S.
export controls for high-technology products.
In remarks to a business lunch, he said such Chinese purchases would
reduce the U.S. trade deficit, noting that China imported $227 billion
worth of integrated circuits last year, but only 4 percent of that came
from the United States.
[to top of second column] |
Flags of U.S. and China are placed for a meeting between Secretary
of Agriculture Sonny Perdue and China's Minister of Agriculture Han
Changfu at the Ministry of Agriculture in Beijing, China June 30,
2017. REUTERS/Jason Lee
Prasad said the United States would be better served by focusing
less on near-term steps but pushing China for bigger reforms such as
opening major portions of its services sector to U.S. competition,
relaxing corporate ownership rules, reducing subsidies for
state-owned enterprises and clamping down on intellectual property
theft.
Some U.S. officials said China was likely to push to turn the
100-day plan into a year-long effort, partly because China is viewed
as unlikely to launch bolder economic reforms before its 19th Party
Congress, a once-in-five-years event to set leadership, takes place
this fall.
The annual summer dialogues, first launched in 2006, have focused in
the past on China's currency practices and what was once viewed as
an undervalued yuan. But that issue has faded after the U.S.
Treasury declined to follow through on Trump's campaign threats to
name Beijing a currency manipulator.
David Dollar, a former Treasury attache to Beijing who is now a
senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, said that as in the
past, the meeting is likely to focus more on process than substance,
with the same complaints airing year after year.
"The cumulative effect of all these dialogues has to have been
pretty minor," he said. "We haven't seen any significant opening up
of the Chinese economy for years."
(Additional reporting by Lesley Wroughton; Editing by Kim Coghill)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|