U.S. top court rejects Trump bid to
include grandparents in travel ban
Send a link to a friend
[July 20, 2017]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court rejected on Wednesday a bid by President Donald Trump to include
grandparents and other relatives of Americans in his travel ban on
people from six Muslim-majority countries.
But in a partial win for Trump, the court gave the government more
leeway to enforce a separate ban on refugees that was included in a
March 6 executive order the president said was necessary for national
security.
A federal judge had ruled against the government on the scope of both
bans last Thursday, prompting the administration to seek Supreme Court
intervention.
The high court's mixed decision means that, for now, grandparents,
grandchildren, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, cousins, and
siblings-in-law are not covered by the 90-day travel ban on people from
Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen who want to enter the
United States.
The court's action on refugees could block entry of up to 24,000
refugees who have a connection to a U.S. resettlement agency, according
to court papers. The Trump administration has said that even if all
24,000 were able to travel, not all of them would have been able to do
so during the 120 days the refugee ban is in effect.
The brief order said the court's decision is temporary while the San
Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals considers a separate
appeal on the same issue. Three of the conservatives on the court of
nine justices noted that they would have granted Trump's request in
full.
In a statement, the U.S. Department of Justice said it "looks forward to
presenting its arguments" to the 9th Circuit.
Hawaii Attorney General Douglas Chin, who challenged the bans in court,
said in a statement that his office also is preparing arguments for the
appeals court on the refugee issue. Chin said the Supreme Court had
validated Hawaii's position "that the Trump administration over-reached
in trying to unilaterally keep families apart from each other."
[to top of second column] |
People wait at the arrival hall at Terminal 4 of JFK airport in New
York City, U.S., June 29, 2017. REUTERS/Joe Penney
Naureen Shah, senior director of campaigns at Amnesty International
USA, said in a statement that the decision on refugees "jeopardizes
the safety of thousands of people across the world including
vulnerable families fleeing war and violence."
The Supreme Court also announced on Wednesday that it has scheduled
oral arguments on broad questions on the lawfulness of the ban for
Oct. 10.
The Trump administration last Friday asked the high court to
overturn a decision on Thursday by U.S. District Judge Derrick
Watson in Hawaii, which limited the scope of the administration's
temporary ban on travelers and the 120-day ban on refugees.
The latest round in the fight over Trump's executive order began
after the Supreme Court intervened last month to partially revive
the two bans. Both had been blocked by lower courts.
The Supreme Court said then that the bans could take effect, but
that people with a "bona fide relationship" to a U.S. person or
entity could not be barred.
The administration had narrowly interpreted that language, saying
the ban would apply to grandparents and other family members. Hawaii
asked Judge Watson to expand the definition of those who could be
admitted and he ruled in favor of the state.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; additional reporting by Mica
Rosenberg and Andrew Chung in New York and Dan Levine in San
Francisco; Editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|