U.S. attempt to limit
Wall Street bonuses fizzles out quietly
Send a link to a friend
[July 22, 2017]
By Lisa Lambert
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The regulatory
agenda released by the Trump administration on Thursday contained a
signal that the U.S. government has halted its work on restricting Wall
Street executives' bonuses and other pay incentives.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law called for federal banking
and securities regulators to create limits on incentive-based
compensation at big financial companies and prevent executives from
receiving outsized rewards for overly risky gambles.
Last year those regulators, many appointed by former President Barack
Obama, a Democrat, rolled out a 500-page rule over many weeks that would
require senior executives to return bonuses earned by making decisions
that materially hurt their banks.
But in the biannual White House agenda on regulation, the rule was
listed under the heading "long-term action," instead of one denoting
regulators were making progress toward a final version. In
Washington-speak that meant the rule was dead.
The move followed President Donald Trump's campaign pledges to lighten
federal regulations that hurt liquidity and strangled business.
"They’re not even working on it," said Lisa Gilbert, who closely tracks
Dodd-Frank implementation for the liberal-leaning public interest group
Public Citizen.
She added that the rule was labeled "pending" in previous agendas. By
law it was supposed to be completed by 2011.
Agencies working on the proposed rule declined to comment.
[to top of second column] |
A street sign for Wall Street is seen outside the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) in Manhattan, New York City, U.S. December 28, 2016.
REUTERS/Andrew Kelly
Regulators neglected last year's proposal, which addressed many concerns raised
about a 2011 draft, even though Obama pushed them to finish it before he left
office.
"We kind of knew it was on the back-burner," said Alexander Monterrubio,
director of regulatory affairs for the National Association of Federally-Insured
Credit Unions trade group. "The unified agenda confirmed that thought."
Each agency had a different view on regulating incentive-based compensation,
making progress difficult, Monterrubio said.
Congress wanted a way to hold top executives accountable after the 2007-09
financial crisis, when some banks experienced major losses partly due to risky
decisions made by their leaders. The call for a rule was renewed when regulators
rapped Wells Fargo & Co. for an incentive method that pushed employees to open
thousands of phantom accounts in customers' names.
But it was politics that likely proved the rule's downfall.
Agencies give the White House lists of their regulatory priorities, which makes
changes based on the president's goals and then publishes what is called the
"unified agenda."
Monterrubio said of the rule: "It wasn’t going to happen under President Trump."
(Additional reporting by Pete Schroeder; editing by Andrew Hay)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |