Trump administration seeks to sidestep
border wall environmental study: sources
Send a link to a friend
[July 22, 2017]
By Emily Flitter
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The U.S. Customs and
Border Patrol plans to use a 2005 anti-terror law to sidestep an
environmental impact study for a section of President Donald Trump's
border wall that will pass through a Texas national refuge for
endangered ocelots, according to two government sources familiar with
the matter.
Trump's 2018 budget proposal calls for 32 miles (51 km) of new border
wall in the Rio Grande Valley Sector of the U.S.-Mexico border, where
the 2,000-acre Santa Ana National Wildlife Refuge is located.
The area near the southern tip of Texas is home to 400 species of birds
as well as a dwindling population of federally protected ocelots. Only
about 50 ocelots remain in the United States, according to the Fish and
Wildlife Service.
The sources said CBP officials had informed them CBP would rely on
exemptions provided to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under
the Real ID Act, a law created on recommendations from the 9/11
Commission, so they can start building the section of wall without
waiting for the years-long environmental study.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5302/a5302718413158d28607f7b2f3388866680c5a95" alt=""
Environmental impact studies are generally required under federal law
whenever a proposal is made to build on public lands, including national
forests, wildlife refuges and land managed by the Bureau of Land
Management.
The Real ID Act also allows the secretary of Homeland Security to exempt
CBP from adhering to the Endangered Species Act, which the sources said
would otherwise make the wall's construction inside the refuge
impossible due to the presence of the ocelots. The sources asked not to
be named because they are not authorized to speak publicly on the
matter.
CBP spokesman Carlos Diaz declined to comment on the sources' assertion
directly. He said in emails to Reuters that plans for constructing the
wall were still uncertain and that the wall's construction depended upon
whether Congress authorizes Trump's proposed 2018 budget.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a36e/3a36ed053d52458bfd0ba4611804aaef08126756" alt=""
President Donald Trump applauds his crowd as he holds a "Make
America Great Again" rally at Orlando Melbourne International
Airport in Melbourne, Florida, February 18, 2017. REUTERS/Kevin
Lamarque
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad38a/ad38a05b22e1184c4ce49cf7b91b6ee340918203" alt=""
He added, however, that a government contractor has already begun
testing soil samples on land near the refuge and that CBP got an
official waiver for permission to do so.
"CBP, like all other federal agencies, may rely on Categorical
Exclusions to achieve NEPA compliance for routine agency activities,
like the soil sampling, that have minimal to no environmental
impact," he said.
Environmental studies are mandates under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA).
The Texas Observer first reported on July 14 that the CBP was
testing soil in Santa Ana.
Congress is expected to take up the 2018 budget in September. The
sources said CBP hopes to start building the wall before the end of
2017.
The CBP's Acting Border Patrol Chief Carla Provost said in testimony
to Congress on June 13 the agency's activities building the wall
would include "environmental planning."
Private industry advocates have said National Environmental Policy
Act requirements for impact studies take too long. Mining industry
executives want the Trump administration to help shorten the
process.
(Reporting By Emily Flitter; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33786/33786ea4132fe1893aec3152058683500d41aabd" alt="" |