NEGLIGENT
HIRING LIABILITY REFORMS STALL IN ILLINOIS
Illinois Policy Institute/Hilary
Gowins
With the right liability reforms, Illinois
can protect businesses and make them more likely to give ex-offenders a
chance at employment. Unfortunately, a bill that would have made this
reform a reality stalled in the Illinois House of Representatives this
session.
|
A bill that would have promoted employment and combatted recidivism for
ex-offenders has stalled in the Illinois House of Representatives.
House Bill 665 would have limited the negligent hiring liability an employer
could face for hiring an employee with a nonviolent, nonsexual criminal
conviction in his or her past.
Employers are rightly concerned about liability related to hiring, and are often
unwilling to hire an ex-offender even if he or she is right for the job because
of the risk that comes with that decision. This is one factor that makes it hard
for someone with a criminal record to obtain work.
Ex-offenders need the hope that comes with work to turn around their lives and
end the vicious cycle of incarceration.
Nearly 50 percent of ex-offenders in Illinois are back in prison within three
years.
[to top of second column] |
But a job changes that. Illinois ex-offenders who are employed a year after
release can have a recidivism rate as low as 16 percent, according to research
from the Safer Foundation.
Illinois offers some negligent hiring liability protection – for employers that
hire former offenders who have been issued certificates of relief from
disabilities and good conduct, for example. These certificates are issued by
courts to former offenders as evidence of the offenders’ rehabilitation. A
certificate can make some offenders eligible for certain business and
professional licenses, and provides protection from lawsuits for employers that
hire the ex-offenders.
Since the Illinois General Assembly’s spring session adjourned at the end of
May, the only way HB 665 could move forward is if lawmakers move the bill during
a special session and it passes by a three-fifths majority.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article |