NSA backtracks on sharing number of
Americans caught in warrant-less spying
Send a link to a friend
[June 10, 2017]
By Dustin Volz
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - For more than a
year, U.S. intelligence officials reassured lawmakers they were working
to calculate and reveal roughly how many Americans have their digital
communications vacuumed up under a warrant-less surveillance law
intended to target foreigners overseas.
This week, the Trump administration backtracked, catching lawmakers off
guard and alarming civil liberties advocates who say it is critical to
know as Congress weighs changes to a law expiring at the end of the year
that permits some of the National Security Agency's most sweeping
espionage.
"The NSA has made Herculean, extensive efforts to devise a counting
strategy that would be accurate," Dan Coats, a career Republican
politician appointed by Republican President Donald Trump as the top
U.S. intelligence official, testified to a Senate panel on Wednesday.
Coats said "it remains infeasible to generate an exact, accurate,
meaningful, and responsive methodology that can count how often a U.S.
person's communications may be collected" under the law known as Section
702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
He told the Senate Intelligence Committee that even if he dedicated more
resources the NSA would not be able to calculate an estimate, which
privacy experts have said could be in the millions.
The statement ran counter to what senior intelligence officials had
previously promised both publicly and in private briefings during the
previous administration of President Barack Obama, a Democrat, lawmakers
and congressional staffers working on drafting reforms to Section 702
said.
Representative John Conyers, the top Democrat in the House of
Representatives Judiciary Committee, said that for many months
intelligence agencies "expressly promised" members of both parties to
deliver the estimated number to them.
Senior intelligence officials had also previously said an estimate could
be delivered. In March, then NSA deputy director Rick Ledgett, said
"yes" when asked by a Reuters reporter if an estimate would be provided
this year.
"We’re working on that with the Congress and we'll come to a
satisfactory resolution, because we have to," said Ledgett, who has
since retired from public service.
The law allows U.S. intelligence agencies to eavesdrop on and collect
vast amounts of digital communications from foreign suspects living
outside of the United States, but often incidentally scoops up
communications of Americans.
The decision to scrap the estimate is likely to complicate a debate in
Congress over whether to curtail certain aspects of the surveillance
law, congressional aides said. Congress must vote to renew Section 702
to avoid its expiration on Dec. 31.
[to top of second column] |
A security car patrols the National Security Agency (NSA) data
center in Bluffdale, Utah, U.S., March 24, 2017. REUTERS/George Frey
Privacy issues often scramble traditional party lines, but there are
signs that Section 702's renewal will be even more politically
unpredictable.
Some Republicans who usually support surveillance programs have
expressed concerns about Section 702, in part because they are
worried about leaks of intercepts of conversations between Trump
associates and Russian officials amid investigations of possible
collusion.
U.S. intelligence agencies last year accused Russia of interfering
in the 2016 presidential election campaign, allegations Moscow
denies. Trump denies there was collusion. Intelligence officials
have said Section 702 was not directly connected to surveillance
related to those leaks.
"As big a fan as I am of collection, incidental collection, I'm not
going to reauthorize a program that could be politically
manipulated," Senator Lindsey Graham, usually a defender of U.S.
surveillance activities, told reporters this week.
Graham was among 14 Republican senators, including every Republican
member of the intelligence panel, who on Tuesday introduced a bill
supported by the White House and top intelligence chiefs, that would
renew Section 702 without changes and make it permanent.
Critics have called the process under which the FBI and other
agencies can query the pool of data collected for U.S. information a
"backdoor search loophole" that evades traditional warrant
requirements.
"How can we accept the government's reassurance that our privacy is
being protected when the government itself has no idea how many
Americans' communications are being swept up and stored?" said Liza
Goitein, a privacy expert at the Brennan Center for Justice.
(Reporting by Dustin Volz; additional reporting by Richard Cowan;
Editing by Jonathan Weber and Grant McCool)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|