| 
             
			
			 The study, the first systematic analysis of police body-camera 
			footage, found subtle but widespread racial disparities in officers’ 
			language. 
			 
			“Our findings highlight that, on the whole, police interactions with 
			black community members are more fraught than their interactions 
			with white community members,” said Jennifer Eberhardt, co-author of 
			the study and professor of psychology at Stanford University in 
			California, in a press release. 
			 
			“Words are power,” Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf said in a statement. 
			“And this study shows that the words police officers use are 
			consequential.” 
			 
			She pledged to work to end racial differences in Oakland policing. 
			 
			Transcripts of 981 stops conducted by 245 Oakland officers in April 
			2014 showed that police were more likely to call white drivers 
			“sir,” or “ma’am,” or to address them by a courtesy title and their 
			last name, while officers were more likely to address black drivers 
			by their first name or call them “bro,” “dude” or “bud.” 
			 
			The racial disparities persisted even after researchers controlled 
			for the race of the officer, the location and the outcome of the 
			stop and the severity of the infraction. 
			  
			Officers were 57 percent more likely to offer an apology, to thank 
			or otherwise speak in what is considered a respectful way to white 
			drivers than blacks, according to the report in the Proceedings of 
			the National Academy of Sciences. 
			 
			On the other hand, officers were 61 percent more likely to address 
			black residents less respectfully; for example, they were more 
			likely to order blacks to keep their hands on the wheel. 
			 
			“To be clear: There was no swearing,” Dan Jurafsky, a study 
			co-author and Stanford professor of linguistics and of computer 
			science, said in a statement. “These were well-behaved officers. But 
			the many small differences in how they spoke with community members 
			added up to pervasive racial disparities.” 
			 
			The Oakland police department is the nation’s first law-enforcement 
			agency to allow a university to examine body-worn camera footage of 
			vehicle stops. The racially diverse Bay Area city of about 420,000 
			was a pioneer of police body cameras in 2010. 
			 
			Supporters of police body cameras, worn now in major cities 
			throughout the U.S, say the footage can help avert or resolve cases 
			of police misconduct. 
			 
			Lead author Rob Voigt, a Stanford linguistics doctoral student, told 
			Reuters Health in an email that the study shows the footage also 
			offers possible insight into everyday police-community relations. 
			 
			“Police departments can use these tools not only to diagnose 
			problems in police-community relations but also to develop 
			solutions,” he said. 
  
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
            
			"Although this study focuses on traffic stops, the findings speak to 
			a known issue about policing and racial bias,” said Dr. Gary Slutkin, 
			founder of Cure Violence at the University of Illinois at Chicago 
			School of Public Health. 
			 
			“Everyone has biases, but because police have so much power over 
			citizens, including to arrest, charge and even use a gun, these 
			biases do cause harm,” Slutkin, who was not involved in the study, 
			said in an email. 
			 
			Every routine traffic stop is “an opportunity to build or erode 
			public trust in the police,” the study authors write. 
			 
			Without knowing the race or gender of the officers or the stopped 
			motorists, 70 undergraduate students rated officers’ transcribed 
			utterances based on their level of respect, politeness and 
			friendliness. 
			Researchers then created a computational linguistic model of how 
			speakers show respect, including apologies and commands, and 
			designed software to identify words and phrases in the body-camera 
			footage transcripts. Investigators employed the software to examine 
			the remaining transcripts. 
			 
			“The racial disparities in officer respect are clear and consistent, 
			yet the causes of these disparities are less clear,” the authors 
			write. 
			 
			“It is certainly possible that some of these disparities are 
			prompted by the language and behavior of the community members 
			themselves, particularly as historical tensions in Oakland and 
			preexisting beliefs about the legitimacy of the police may induce 
			fear, anger, or stereotype threat,” they write. “However, community 
			member speech cannot be the sole cause of these disparities.” 
			 
			Police encounters tend to be stressful, and the study highlights the 
			need for community interventions, like mental health and 
			substance-abuse prevention programs, to try to reduce residents’ 
			encounters with law enforcement, Slutkin said. 
			
			  
			SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2sfVbGH Proceedings of the National Academy of 
			Sciences, June 5, 2017. 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |