California Supreme Court upholds
cap-and-trade law
Send a link to a friend
[June 29, 2017]
By Dan Whitcomb
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The California
Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to consider a challenge by business
groups of the state's cap-and-trade law, a ruling that environmentalists
hailed as ending a legal fight that had cast a cloud over the program.
The state supreme court did not issue a written opinion on the program
itself but declined take up the case on appeal from a lower court.
"This is the final step in this case to affirm California’s innovative
climate program, including its carbon auctions, which serves as a vital
safeguard to ensure polluters are held accountable for their pollution,"
Erica Morehouse, a senior attorney for the Environmental Defense Fund,
said in a written statement.Representatives for the state Chamber of
Commerce, which led the legal challenge, could not be reached for
comment on Wednesday evening.
California's program to cap emissions and trade carbon permits is a
crucial component of a broader effort to reduce the state's output of
heat-trapping greenhouse gases to 1990 levels by the end of the decade.
The carbon market sets a steadily declining cap on the state's carbon
output and then sells or gives permits that businesses are required to
submit every three years to the state to cover their emissions.
[to top of second column] |
California Governor Jerry Brown speaks in Sacramento, California,
U.S. on January 9, 2014. REUTERS/Max Whittaker/File Photo
The program has come under fire from critics who have said a glut of
permits reduced the incentive for businesses to cut emissions.
Businesses have been uncertain about the future of the program,
which as originally passed was scheduled to end in 2020. The lawsuit
by business groups had also threatened to scuttle the program
entirely.
"With this Supreme Court victory, now it’s up to us to take action
extending California’s cap-and-trade system on a more permanent
basis," California Governor Jerry Brown said in a written statement
following the ruling.
(Reporting By Tom Brown)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|