Under Xi, wealth of China's uber-rich
lawmakers grew faster than economy
Send a link to a friend
[March 02, 2017]
By John Ruwitch
SHANGHAI (Reuters) - The fortunes of the
richest 100 members of China's parliament and its advisory body - all
dollar billionaires - grew about 64 percent in the four years since Xi
Jinping rose to power, according to data from an organization tracking
wealth in China.
Xi has overseen a crackdown on corruption and decadence, and made the
fight against poverty a top priority after becoming president in 2013.
Since then, however, the wealth of the upper crust in the National
People's Congress (NPC) and the Chinese People's Political Consultative
Conference (CPPCC), tracked by the Shanghai-based Hurun Report, has
grown faster than the wider economy, the stock market, home prices and
wages.
The NPC and CPPCC start their annual sessions in Beijing on Friday.
While their membership cuts across society, this year 209 delegates -
about 4 percent of the total - have been identified by Hurun as each
being worth 2 billion yuan ($290.7 million) or more.
Their combined wealth is close to the GDP of Belgium, totaling nearly
3.5 trillion yuan, or more than $507 billion.
And over half of them are dollar billionaires. According to Hurun's
estimates, the top 100 are worth a combined 3 trillion yuan this year,
up 64 percent from 1.84 trillion yuan in 2013.
That represents an average annual increase in their wealth of 13 percent
over the four year period from 2013-2016, compared with economic growth
averaging 7.2 percent, an average rise of 7 percent in the CSI300 stock
index, and an average 5 percent increase in home prices over the same
period.
Wage data is less up to date, but for the three years from 2013 to 2015
annual wage growth roughly averaged 9 percent.
All of the super-rich in parliament or its advisory body are in
business, rather than career bureaucrats. Among them are Hong Kong
businessman Victor Li, Pony Ma of tech giant Tencent Holdings Ltd
<0700.HK>, and Robin Li of Baidu Inc <BIDU.O>.
Rupert Hoogewerf, founder and publisher of Hurun Report, notes that the
companies represented by the wealthy lawmakers have had a big impact in
terms of taxes and employment.
"Having these stakeholders as advisers to the government I can
understand makes a lot of sense," he said.
BUREAUCRATIC STATUS
While all Chinese over the age of 18 are technically allowed to vote for
delegates and stand for election to the NPC, most delegates are
hand-picked by local level officials.
[to top of second column] |
A combo picture shows (L-R) the top richest members of China's
parliament and its advisory body, Victor Li of Cheung Kong, Lee
Ka-Kit of Henderson Land, Pony Ma of Tencent, Zong Qinghou of
Wahaha, Henry Cheng Kar-Shun of New World Development, Robin Li of
Baidu, Lu Zhiqiang of Oceanwide, Xu Jiayin of Evergrande, Zhang
Jindong of Suning, Peter Woo of Wheelock, Lei Jun of Xiaomi
Technology, Zhang Shiping of Weiqiao Pioneering, Yang Guoqiang of
Country Garden, Chen Lihua of Fu Wah International, Xu Rongmao of
Shimao, Guo Guangchang of Fosun. REUTERS/Stringers
The presence of rich businessmen in parliament and its advisory
panel is a calculated move by the ruling Communist Party, said Rory
Truex, an assistant professor at Princeton.
"By giving the extremely wealthy a position in parliament that kind
of helps ensure their loyalty and it gives them a vested interest in
the success of the party," he said.
The entrepreneurs benefit, too, according to Truex, who published a
paper in 2014 showing businesses that had a CEO in 11th NPC
(2008-2012) enjoyed a "reputation boost" that increased operating
profits by 3-4 percent. He has not analyzed data for the current
session of parliament.
Victor Shih, a scholar of elite Chinese politics at the University
of California San Diego, said businessmen valued seats at local and
national levels because "it affords them a certain degree of
political protection".
The NPC did not respond to a query submitted online about its
ultra-wealthy delegates, and calls to the CPPCC's press office were
not answered.
(Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|