Maryland to join other states in court
challenge to Trump's travel ban
Send a link to a friend
[March 11, 2017]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Maryland
became the latest state to join in legal challenges against President
Donald Trump's revised temporary travel ban on Friday, with its attorney
general saying it would join a lawsuit brought by Washington and other
states.
Attorney General Brian Frosh said his office would formally join the
suit on Monday.
"The administration persists in an effort to implement a policy that is
inhumane and unconstitutional, but also makes us less safe, not more
safe," Frosh said in a statement.
The new travel order, which is set to take effect on Wednesday, replaced
a more sweeping ban issued on Jan. 27 that caused chaos and protests at
airports.
The first order, which temporarily halted the entry of refugees and
travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries, was hit by more than two
dozen lawsuits.
Detractors claimed it discriminated against Muslims and violated the
U.S. Constitution.
The government has said the president has wide authority to implement
immigration policy and that the travel rules are necessary to protect
against terrorist attacks.
"Trump's second executive order is still a Muslim ban," Frosh said in
the statement.
The state of Washington brought one of the suits against the original
ban, and last month a federal judge in Seattle ordered an emergency halt
to the policy. That ruling was upheld by an appeals court in San
Francisco.
[to top of second column] |
Washington is now asking the court to apply the emergency halt to
the new ban, arguing it is a veiled version of the old one.
The new order keeps a 90-day ban on travel to the United States by
citizens of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, but
excludes Iraq. Refugees are still halted from entering the country
for 120 days, but the new order removed an indefinite ban on all
refugees from Syria.
Oregon and Minnesota also are joining Washington's challenge. Hawaii
has a separate case pending against the new ban.
Frosh said the ban would make Maryland less competitive by deterring
visits by academics, scientists and engineers from other countries
and would hurt Maryland's universities and economy.
The U.S. Department of Justice has declined to comment on the
states' cases because the litigation is pending.
(Reporting by David Alexander in Washington and Mica Rosenberg in
New York; Editing by Leslie Adler)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |