UK
royals' sibling rivalry? Princess Anne says GMO crops
have benefits
Send a link to a friend
[March 22, 2017] LONDON
(Reuters) - Britain's Princess Anne may have sparked
some royal sibling rivalry after saying genetically
modified crops had real benefits to offer, putting her
at odds with her older brother Charles who says they
would be an environmental disaster.
|
In an interview with BBC radio, Anne said she would grow GMO
crops on her farming estates, adding she doubted that the
technology had many downsides.
That view contrasts sharply with that of heir-to-the-throne
Charles, who has long been an ardent campaigner for organic
produce, once warning the widespread use of GM crops would
"cause the biggest disaster environmentally of all time".
"GM is one of those things that divides people," Anne, whose
title is the Princess Royal, told the BBC's "Farming Today"
program.
"Surely if we are going to be better at producing food of the
right value, then we have to accept that genetic technology ...
is going to be part of that," she said in the interview to be
aired on Thursday.
European Union laws strictly control the use and authorization
to grow GM organisms, but last October environment minister
George Eustice said the British government was considering
"possible future arrangements" for the regulation of GM
organisms after Britain leaves the bloc.
[to top of second column] |
Asked if she would use GM for crops and livestock on her own farming
lands in Gloucestershire, western England, should the law allow, the
66-year-old daughter of Queen Elizabeth replied "Yes".
"To say we mustn't go there 'just in case' is probably not a
practical argument," she said. "I do think ... gene technology has
got real benefits to offer, which will have maybe an occasional
downside, but I suspect not very many."
Anne's attitude toward GM crops has long differed from that of
Charles, patron of the Soil Association which campaigns against the
use of GM produce.
In a newspaper interview in 2008 Charles said multinational food
companies were conducting a "gigantic experiment with nature and the
whole of humanity which has gone seriously wrong".
(Reporting by Michael Holden; editing by Stephen Addison)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |