Trump, Koch brothers at odds over
'Trumpcare' vote
Send a link to a friend
[March 22, 2017]
By James Oliphant, Emily Stephenson and Caren Bohan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans
considering whether or not to back U.S. President Donald Trump's
healthcare reforms in a crucial House of Representatives vote this week
face a painful choice.
If they vote against, they could face the wrath of a vengeful and
combative president. If they vote for it, they risk retribution from the
billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch and other powerful
right-wing players whose money can be pivotal in re-election races.
As Trump faces the most formidable, high-stakes negotiation of his
presidency, the fierce battle in the U.S. Congress over his plan to
replace Obamacare is a test of whether Republicans will trust him with
their political futures at the risk of alienating deep-pocketed
conservative advocacy groups.
As Trump and leaders in the House round up support for the bill ahead of
a planned Thursday vote, some groups are threatening to retaliate
against those who do support it, including the Club for Growth, the
Heritage Foundation's political arm, and Americans for Prosperity, which
is part of the expansive political pressure network established by the
Koch brothers.
All three groups are “keying” the vote, which means it will be a factor
in determining whether the groups deem a lawmaker to be sufficiently
conservative. That opens up the possibility that some Republicans who
vote in favor of the bill could face a primary challenge in next year’s
congressional elections and may not be able to count on help from the
Kochs and others.
Trump himself warned House Republicans in a meeting on Tuesday that
their seats will be at risk next year if they do not support his
healthcare bill, which would modify but not eliminate Obamacare,
formally known as the Affordable Care Act, Democratic former President
Barack Obama's signature healthcare legislation passed in 2010.
“He warned us that there are consequences if we don’t come together for
us as a party and also for individuals,” Representative Richard Hudson
of North Carolina said after the meeting. “He wasn’t threatening in any
way. He was just giving us a pretty clear warning.”
Trump also told Representative Mark Meadows of North Carolina, an
outspoken critic of the bill, that he was "coming after" him, according
to people in the meeting. Meadows later said the president was joking.
'OUTSIDER' JOINS ESTABLISHMENT
Some Conservatives believe the bill does not go far enough in
dismantling Obamacare and have not been satisfied by the White House’s
attempts to mollify them. NBC News reported on Tuesday that 26 House
Republicans oppose the bill, which would leave House Speaker Paul Ryan
short of the 216 votes he needs. No Democrat is expected to support the
bill.
The conflict has created an odd dynamic: Trump, who ran as an “outsider”
candidate siding with the Republican political establishment against the
hard-line conservatives who were some of his most ardent supporters.
At the same time, Trump has never been a favorite of libertarian
conservatives such as the Kochs, or of groups such as the Club for
Growth, because, among other things, he has never taken a strong stand
on reining in federal spending. They opposed him during the Republican
presidential campaign.
For them, the healthcare vote is a test of their continued relevance in
a party seized by Trump.
The Koch network spent an estimated $250 million on last year’s
election. The Koch-run Americans for Prosperity, which has chapters in
more than 30 states and boasts that it can deploy 3.2 million citizen
activists, spent almost $14 million on the 2016 elections, according to
federal records. Freedom Partners, another Koch entity which largely
targeted Democrats with attack ads, spent $30 million.
[to top of second column] |
President Donald Trump (C) and Health and Human Services Secretary
Tom Price (L) enter the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., March 21,
2017. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
Tim Phillips, president of Americans for Prosperity, would not say
directly that Republicans who support the bill will face consequences
next year, but noted, “Members of Congress know how serious we take a
vote like this.”
James Davis, a spokesman for Freedom Partners, said “network
organizations will stand with principled lawmakers who will oppose
the House healthcare proposal.”
Davis said the Koch network would spend between $300 million and
$400 million ahead of the 2018 elections.
KOCH INFLUENCE
Last year, Americans for Prosperity and the Club for Growth targeted
an incumbent House Republican, then-Representative Renee Ellmers of
North Carolina, for being too close with House leadership and not
holding the line on government spending. Ellmers lost in a primary
fight.
House Republicans have been nervous about primary challenges since
2014 when Eric Cantor, then the majority leader, lost to a
little-known conservative named David Brat.
Phillips said his organization last year was instrumental in getting
Republican incumbents Senators Rob Portman of Ohio and Pat Toomey of
Pennsylvania re-elected. The two leading Koch groups sat out
then-Senator Kelly Ayotte’s tight race in New Hampshire. Ayotte lost
by 0.1 percent of the vote.
“Groups such as the Kochs have been an important part of a coalition
of outside Republican money,” said Nathan Gonzales, a congressional
political analyst in Washington. “If that coalition falters, that
could contribute to Democratic gains.”
But several lawmakers interviewed by Reuters were dismissive of the
opposition by conservative groups.
“For me, this healthcare bill is an absolute no-brainer,” said
Representative Devin Nunes of California, a close Trump ally. “Any
conservative group who opposes it, I don’t even understand how they
can categorize themselves as being a conservative group.”
The bill’s supporters have argued that voters are more likely to
punish Republicans who do not act to replace Obamacare when given
the chance. “If it fails there are going to be a lot of people who
are looking for work in 2018,” said Representative Mike Conaway of
Texas.
The political implications of the bill, though, remain largely
unclear.
Even if it passes the House, the bill faces a difficult path in the
Senate, where several conservatives have declared their opposition.
Veteran House members recall in 2009, when then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi
forced a vote on a bill that would cap carbon emissions. The bill
did not pass the Senate, and many Democrats from coal states lost
their seats in the 2010 elections for their votes.
(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwall and Steve Holland; Editing
by Jason Szep and Bill Rigby)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |