Anti-abortion activists seek dismissal of
California privacy case
Send a link to a friend
[May 04, 2017]
By Lisa Fernandez
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Lawyers for two
anti-abortion activists who secretly filmed a conference of abortion
providers while pretending to work for a fetal-tissue procurement
company asked a California judge on Wednesday to dismiss eavesdropping
charges against the pair.
Defense attorneys asserted in court papers that the criminal complaint
brought by California's attorney general against David Daleiden, 28, and
Sandra Merritt, 63, was insufficient because it failed to identify their
alleged victims by name.
Daleiden and Merritt are each charged with conspiracy and 14 counts of
invasion of privacy for creating false identities to infiltrate the
abortion conference, then videotaping various conference participants
and others without their consent.
The two are accused of fabricating a sham biomedical research firm,
BioMax Procurement Services, to gain access to private meetings of the
National Abortion Federation (NAF), Planned Parenthood and others
affiliated with reproductive healthcare.
The individuals they taped are referred to in charging documents as DOE
1 through 14. Prosecutors filed identifying information in a sealed
confidential attachment.
If the judge sides with the defense, finding prosecutors lack
justification for keeping the alleged victims anonymous, the state could
be forced to amend its complaint and reveal their names in order to
proceed.
Defense lawyer Steve Cooley, representing Daleiden, said state Attorney
General Xavier Becerra, a Democrat, was conducting a political
prosecution.
Daleiden, who runs the California-based nonprofit Center for Medical
Progress, and Merritt, a fellow anti-abortion activist and retired
teacher, have cast themselves as "citizen journalists" who employed
well-worn undercover tactics of the news media to expose wrongdoing.
But prosecutors said Daleiden and Merritt engaged in computer hacking
and criminal fraud to create false IDs and a bogus corporate entity -
crossing lines that bona fide journalists would avoid.
[to top of second column] |
Anti-abortion activist David Daleiden, waits outside Superior Court
in San Francisco, California, U.S., May 3, 2017. REUTERS/Lisa
Fernandez
The case stems from recordings made at an April 2014 NAF conference
in San Francisco and several subsequent restaurant meetings in Los
Angeles and El Dorado, California.
Distribution of those tapes and others from a 2015 NAF conference in
Baltimore were barred under federal court order after NAF sued
Daleiden's group in 2015.
But Daleiden has released other videos targeting Planned Parenthood
purporting to show its officials trying to profit from the sale
aborted fetal tissue, in violation of federal law.
Planned Parenthood accused Daleiden of using the videos to distort
its practices, in which it lawfully seeks only to recover costs
associated with fetal tissue donations for scientific research.
Daleiden and Merritt were indicted in January 2016 for using illegal
government identifications to secretly film a Planned Parenthood
facility in Texas, but that case was dropped. Both are slated for
arraignment in the California case on June 8.
Daleiden surrendered to authorities last month under an arrest
warrant and was released on $75,000 bond. Merritt was taken into
custody at the court on Thursday and was expected to post bond later
in the day.
(Additional reporting and writing by Steve Gorman in Los Angeles;
Editing by Robert Birsel)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |