U.S. Commerce's Ross says 3 percent GDP
growth not achievable this year
Send a link to a friend
[May 10, 2017]
By David Lawder and Jennifer Ablan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. economy
will fall short of the Trump administration's goal of 3 percent growth
this year and will only achieve that when its regulatory, tax, trade and
energy policies are fully in place, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said
on Tuesday.
The GDP target "is certainly not achievable this year," Ross told
Reuters in an interview. "The Congress has been slow-walking everything.
We don't even have half the people in place."
But Ross said it ultimately could be achieved in the year after all of
Republican President Donald Trump's business-friendly policies are
implemented. He noted that delays were possible if the push for tax cuts
was slowed down in Congress.
Ross also signaled the Trump administration would try to use existing
tools to aggressively enforce trade rules and insist on fairer treatment
for U.S. goods, rather than adopt the slash-and-burn approach Trump
discussed on the campaign trail in 2016.
The comments appear to represent another move to the center by the
administration, with Ross acknowledging that trade deficits for things
like imported oil are "blameless" and not inherently bad.
Ross, a billionaire investor, said the Commerce Department is working on
some "self-initiated" anti-dumping and anti-subsidy cases on behalf of
private industries that could help shield them from unfairly traded
imports.
"I believe that enforcement will be one of the major tools for fixing
things," he said.
FEARS OF PROTECTIONISM
U.S. trading partners have been spooked by Trump's vow to renegotiate or
pull out of trade deals, such as the North American Free Trade
Agreement, which he considers unfair to U.S. industry and workers.
Ross said that the administration was still undecided on whether to
split NAFTA into parallel bilateral deals with Canada and Mexico or
stick with the current trilateral format.
A possible rise in the use of U.S. tariffs to punish foreign companies
deemed to be competing unfairly also has raised concerns of a wave of
protectionism.
Ross, however, insisted that the Trump administration was not aiming to
restrict trade with its actions.
"What we are restricting is trade that violates trade agreements or
violates WTO rules. Not much point of having trade agreements if you are
not going to enforce them," he said.
He said World Trade Organization rules were slow to punish trade
violators and singled out its most-favored nation clause as a problem
for Washington because it allows widely divergent tariffs.
[to top of second column] |
U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross sits for a portrait after an
interview in his office in Washington, U.S. May 9, 2017.
REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
The United States, for example, has a 2.5 percent tariff on vehicle
imports for countries without U.S. free trade deals, while the
European Union has a 10 percent tariff and China collects a 25
percent tariff.
"The reality is from the point of view of the U.S., the most favored
nation clause is actually an impediment to freeing up trade," Ross
said, adding that tariffs would come down if reciprocity was
respected.
But how such a change could be made to equalize tariffs within the
organization "remains to be seen," he added.
Ross also said that not all U.S. trade deficits are necessarily bad
or the result of trade agreement violations, as there are some
"blameless" deficits such as those caused by the U.S. need to import
oil.
Ross also acknowledged that the Trump administration's announcement
that it wants to renegotiate NAFTA had contributed to the Mexican
peso's decline and "misalignment" against the dollar.
He said this was a "bizarre" situation that made Mexican goods
cheaper and increased the U.S. trade deficit, adding that it was
worsened by congressional delays in launching the start of NAFTA
talks and confirming the nominee for U.S. Trade Representative,
Robert Lighthizer.
"Congressional delays are actually causing more of an import problem
from Mexico than we had before," he said.
Asked if he thought that the dollar's strength was a problem for
achieving U.S. trade goals he said: "I don’t think it is so much
that the dollar is too strong as that the other currencies are too
weak."
He added the Commerce Department would focus on "the things we can
fix", such as battling foreign state subsidies and the dumping of
products below cost in U.S. markets.
(Reporting by David Lawder, Kevin Krolicki, David Chance, Jennifer
Ablan and Howard Schneider; Editing by Paul Simao and Tom Brown)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |