Government worker unions wield tremendous power, which they then leverage for 
personal gain even if it means harming the people they serve. 
 
Nowhere is that more clear than in the context of teachers unions. When teacher 
unions flex their muscles, students and families are harmed the most. 
 
A recent situation in East Aurora – where the union is preventing bus 
transportation for thousands of students – shows how teacher unions are willing 
to interfere with the everyday lives of their students in order to get what they 
want. 
 
The East Aurora District 131 teachers union is standing in the way of a plan to 
provide busing for 3,000 additional students that would actually lower busing 
costs in the district. 
 
In April 2017, the school district voted to approve buses for all students who 
live 1.5 miles or more from their schools. The vote meant bus transportation 
would be available to more than 3,000 additional students.
  
To most efficiently provide the additional busing, the school district is 
considering staggering start times at the schools. According to the district, 
staggering start times would lower three-year busing costs between $343,000 and 
$441,000. 
 
It should seem like a win-win situation: More kids are bused, and the school 
district saves taxpayer money. 
 
[to top of second column]  | 
            
			 
  
			But there’s a catch. The union representing teachers and staff 
			disapprove of increased busing if it means changing school start 
			times. 
			Like many school districts around the state, the teachers’ 
			collective bargaining contract with the district governs school 
			start and end times. Changing the contract means negotiations 
			between the union and the school district. And that hamstrings 
			school districts from making timely decisions about the school day. 
			 
			Of course, the union in East Aurora could simply recognize that 
			busing more students is in the students’ best interests and 
			negotiate a quick addendum to the original contract addressing start 
			times. 
			 
			But it doesn’t sound like union president Gerry Mestek is willing to 
			go the quick and painless route. Instead, he indicated that the 
			negotiating process could take too long to put the expanded busing 
			in place for next year. 
			 
			In the meantime, those 3,000 students will not have bus 
			transportation next year. 
			 
			As the situation in East Aurora demonstrates, teacher unions don’t 
			operate to push for the best interests of students. They operate to 
			advance union priorities. And students and their families suffer for 
			it. 
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article 
			 |