U.S. court puts hold on
'too big to fail' case involving MetLife
Send a link to a friend
[May 13, 2017]
By Lisa Lambert
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court
on Friday granted a 60-day pause in the long-running case in which the
country's largest life insurer, MetLife Inc, has challenged the federal
government's labeling of it as "too big to fail," as the Trump
administration wrestles with reforms arising from the financial crisis.
More than a year ago, U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer struck down
the government's designation of MetLife as "systemically important,"
which signifies it could devastate the financial system if it failed and
triggers stricter oversight, saying the label was "arbitrary and
capricious." The administration of former President Barack Obama, a
Democrat, immediately appealed.
In October the government and insurance company had a rematch before two
judges appointed by Obama, Sri Srinivasan and Patricia Millett, and one
by former President George H.W. Bush, a Republican. At the time most
expected a ruling to soon follow, with the losing side possibly
appealing to the Supreme Court.
Republican President Donald Trump, however, has expressed skepticism
about the designation process and the council of regulatory heads that
assign the labels, and has ordered the Treasury Department to review
both. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin also has said the council's work
should be evaluated.
The 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, intended to avoid a repeat
of the 2007-09 crisis and recession, created the Financial Stability
Oversight Council and empowered it to designate non-banks as
systemically important.
[to top of second column] |
A MetLife Inc building is shown in Irvine, California, U.S., January
24, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake
Last week the council asked the court to put the appeal on hold for 60 days,
saying it needed "additional time for deliberation."
Previously MetLife had asked for a pause until Treasury completed its review. A
spokesman for the company said it was pleased with the 60-day abeyance.
The company is not officially labeled "too big to fail" during the appeal.
Currently, only two firms, both insurance companies, carry the label: American
International Group, which received a $182 billion bailout during the crisis,
and Prudential Insurance.
(Reporting by Lisa Lambert and Lawrence Hurley; Editing by Cynthia Osterman and
Bill Trott)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|