Merck, Upsher-Smith to
pay $60 million in 'pay-for-delay' drug case
Send a link to a friend
[May 17, 2017] By
Nate Raymond
(Reuters) - Merck & Co Inc and Upsher-Smith
Laboratories Inc have agreed to pay $60.2 million to resolve a lawsuit
that said they entered into a deal to unlawfully delay the availability
of generic versions of potassium supplement K-Dur.
|
The settlement, disclosed in papers filed in federal court in
Newark, New Jersey on Monday, came in a class action filed in 2001
arising out of a settlement in patent litigation between Upsher-Smith
and Schering-Plough Corp, now owned by Merck.
That patent deal, plaintiffs in the antitrust class action said, was
an example of a "pay-for-delay" settlement, in which brand-name drug
makers pay generic companies to keep their products off the market
for a longer period.
Both companies continued to deny wrongdoing as part of the
settlement, according to court papers. The settlement is subject to
court approval.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2756e/2756e54ae031cef6293ceed1e3d99847ff7bfee1" alt=""
Neither Merck nor Upsher-Smith immediately responded to requests for
comment on Tuesday.
The lawsuit stemmed from a settlement between the companies in 1998
that resolved patent litigation in which Schering-Plough sought to
block Upsher-Smith from marketing a planned generic version of K-Dur
until a patent expired in 2006.
Under that settlement, Upsher-Smith agreed not to market a generic
version before 2001, at which point Schering would grant it a
license, and Schering agreed to pay Upsher-Smith at least $60
million, according to court papers.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a574/3a574f3f16be90bfbc59666e7a800d74057bdc17" alt=""
The class action lawsuit, by direct purchasers of K-Dur including
drug wholesalers and hospitals, said the companies violated
antitrust laws through the unlawful delay of generic K-Dur.
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission had also sued Schering-Plough in
2011 over payments to rivals to delay generic versions of K-Dur. The
FTC ultimately lost that case.
The case is In re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court,
District of New Jersey, No. 01-cv-01652.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; editing by Grant McCool)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1aae0/1aae07902abb38a03198316638aa5f64b1ce1311" alt="" |