“I have an announcement,” Chicago Democrat Barbara Flynn Currie said the
afternoon of May 10 on the floor of the Illinois House of Representatives, “perk
up your ears. Listen close.”
“Friday session has been cancelled.”
Illinois lawmakers erupted in giddy applause. The video footage is disturbing.
Earlier that day, the House floor used precious time to discuss the upcoming
House v. Senate softball game and basketball game. State Rep. Litesa Wallace,
D-Rockford, assured House members cheerleaders and pom-poms would be ready.
There has been no state budget for nearly 700 days. And spring session for the
House will end May 31. But the state’s legislative leaders don’t seem to care.
While lawmakers are feigning exhaustion in trying to devise a compromise, the
facts tell a completely different story.
Put aside the athletics and days off. Just look at the budget-making process
itself. They’re playing political football.
The nuts and bolts of the Illinois state budget are supposed to be worked out in
appropriation committees. These committees offer a time for lawmakers to discuss
tough issues on the record. They offer an opportunity for constituents to weigh
in. They are the laboratories from which real budget proposals should emerge.
But they’re not working.
Allocating billions of dollars in state spending is a tough task for a single
committee to handle. The House, for example, has five appropriations committees
focusing on different parts of the budget.
But the appropriations committee for general services has met only twice in the
last 20 days.
And with all the talk Illinoisans have heard from lawmakers about how our state
funds public education, the appropriations committee for elementary and
secondary education has only met twice in nearly 50 days.
During a time of such struggle across the state, this is insulting.
Before the end of Spring session, there will likely be a mad dash to pass a
budget. That’s because after May 31, bills will require three-fifths approval
from the House and Senate instead of a simple majority.
[to top of second column] |
In other words, the odds Illinois continues without a budget
until 2018 increase sharply if nothing passes before the end of May.
But lawmakers have already set themselves up for failure. Perhaps
on purpose.
House members can’t honestly analyze a budget when they haven’t
attended an appropriations committee hearing on some major budget
items for over a month.
But who cares about the House? The Senate is where all the action
is, right?
For now, yes. But if past is prologue, the “Grand Bargain”
negotiations are nothing but a political ploy for Senate President
John Cullerton to avoid taking blame.
What Illinoisans need to know is that for the better part of the
last decade, House Speaker Mike Madigan has hijacked the budget
process at the last second, with disastrous results. This is by
design. Cullerton is complicit. And there’s little reason to think
the same dance won’t happen again this year.
Typically, the Senate passes a complete budget package over to the
House and Madigan sits on it. And sits on it. And sits on it. Then
at the eleventh hour, after the speaker has made all his deals, he
guts the entire package and replaces it with a plan of his own. This
budget plan almost always spends more than the state takes in.
When his plan passes the House, Madigan bangs his gavel and ends the
session. House members then go on summer break.
This is the speaker’s political perversion at work.
The Senate is then stuck with two options: Pass the Madigan budget
and send it to the governor, or reject it and take the blame for
tanking the budget.
They choose option No. 1, so the Illinois governor is stuck with a
bad budget and a General Assembly that’s already left the building.
Sign it and the pressure goes away. Veto it and you’re the villain.
It’s cartoonish.
Rauner should know that the wheels are in motion to stick him with a
bloated, out-of-balance budget that contains little of the necessary
economic reforms for which he has fought.
And Illinoisans should know their legislative leaders are to blame.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|