Ahead of Exxon's annual
meeting, climate activists gain ground
Send a link to a friend
[May 22, 2017]
By Ross Kerber
BOSTON
(Reuters) - Shareholder activists focused on climate issues are gaining
traction in their push to have large energy companies and utilities take
account of the impact rising global temperatures could have on their
businesses.
Proponents ranging from giant New York and California state pension
funds to Wespath Investment Management of Illinois scored a number of
victories this month.
Those include a resolution at PPL Corp <PPL.N> approved by 57 percent of
votes cast calling for the utility holding company to publicly report
how it could be affected by policies and technologies aimed at limiting
global warning.
The PPL result comes on the heels of a vote at Occidental Petroleum Corp
on a similar resolution, backed by two-thirds of votes cast. Also, top
proxy advisers recommended votes in favor of a third such resolution set
for Exxon Mobil Corp's annual meeting on May 31.
Activists say the developments suggest they are at an inflection point
after years of seeking support from big institutional investors like
BlackRock Inc. The giant New York asset manager switched sides in this
year's vote at Occidental, citing concerns about the company's pace of
disclosures to date.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a372b/a372b9ccc39539b22bf5c002b6dddec9d9a517c5" alt=""
The reports the activists have sought through the advisory shareholder
resolutions are sometimes known as "2 degree scenario analysis" reports
after the goal of the 2015 Paris climate accord to limit global
temperature increases to 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) from
preindustrial levels by phasing out fossil fuels.
The limits could hit companies' bottom lines such as by reducing the
revenue they can expect from extracting fossil fuel reserves. Activists
hope that having the companies lay out plans for dealing with future
regulatory, technology and market changes will smooth their transition
to cleaner energy.
Edward Kamonjoh, executive director of the 50/50 Climate Project in
Washington, which supports the resolutions, said actions by U.S.
President Donald Trump like the dismantling of Obama-era climate
policies may have moved big investors to take on a more active role.
While Trump has not so far followed through on a campaign promise to
take the United States out of the Paris deal, investors cannot count on
strong environmental regulations in the future, he said.
"Investors who feel that climate is a risk now realize they just have
themselves to manage this risk in the next few years," Kamonjoh said.
MOOD TEST
Most energy company and utility boards have urged their investors to
oppose the measures, some arguing they already take climate change
seriously.
A key test of investors' mood will come at the end of May at Exxon. The
largest U.S. oil & gas producer argues a climate report is unnecessary
because it already conducts reviews that sufficiently test its business
for impacts from changing technology and energy demand.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3bbd/f3bbdf48827b64303bedb7719c1cb5a90b8d2ec0" alt=""
An airplane comes in for a landing above an Exxon sign at a gas
station in the Chicago suburb of Norridge, Illinois, U.S., October
27, 2016. REUTERS/Jim Young
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0392/c0392601a5745395bf4a1be89d01db8aaf3baded" alt=""
Exxon has offered other arguments including that it supports the Paris
agreement, Exxon Secretary Jeffrey Woodbury told investors in a May 18
letter, and that it has invested nearly $7 billion since 2000 on
emissions-reduction technology.
At PPL, spokesman Ryan Hill said via e-mail that its board "will
carefully consider the results and determine the best path forward." PPL
is committed to sustainable energy, he said, noting steps it has taken
such as retiring coal plants and building Kentucky's largest solar power
facility.
Some companies have made changes even without votes. Activists including
Wespath on May 2 said they withdrew a call for a climate-change report
from Chevron Corp, <CVX.N> citing an 18-page document Chevron issued in
March titled "Managing Climate Risks" as a good first step.
While it did not analyze all the scenarios sought by activists, the
report went further than past efforts to outline how climate change
could affect its profitability.
Chevron CEO John Watson said in the report he "shares the concerns of
governments and the public about climate change risks."
Also, Danielle Fugure, president of California nonprofit As You Sow,
said last month it withdrew a shareholder resolution calling for a
climate risk report from Anadarko Petroleum Corp.<APC.N>. In return, she
said, the Texas company agreed to continue to work with her group and
others to develop methods for reporting on climate risks that would be
practical for the company but still convey to investors the full extent
of the risks it could face.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67bbf/67bbf254c72a79c508a964e293baf86281c39bc1" alt=""
Anadarko spokesman John Christiansen confirmed the agreement. "We are
consistently looking for ways to further enhance sustainability in our
operations, as well as improve transparency regarding these efforts," he
said via e-mail.
Fugure said the high vote totals such as at Occidental show how climate
change is becoming an accepted business issue. "The market itself is
moving to take carbon risk into account, and the market itself will be
pricing carbon risk into the value of companies," she said.
(Additional reporting by Gary McWilliams and Ernest Scheyder in Houston;
Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |