Justice Department asks U.S. judge to
reconsider ruling against Trump sanctuary order
Send a link to a friend
[May 23, 2017]
By Dan Levine
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice
Department on Monday asked a federal judge to reconsider a ruling which
blocked President Donald Trump's attempt to cut off federal funding for
so-called sanctuary cities, citing a new memo from the attorney general.
U.S. District Judge William Orrick III in San Francisco last month said
Trump's order targeted broad categories of federal funding for sanctuary
governments and that plaintiffs challenging the order were likely to
succeed in proving it unconstitutional.
The Republican president's moves on immigration have galvanized legal
advocacy groups, along with Democratic city and state governments, to
oppose them in court. The administration suffered an earlier defeat when
two federal judges suspended executive orders restricting travel from
several Muslim-majority countries. The government has appealed those
decisions.
The new filing comes in the wake of a memo released on Monday in which
Attorney General Jeff Sessions formally endorsed a narrower
interpretation of Trump's order, saying that the only funds the
government intended to withhold were certain grants tied to law
enforcement programs.
"The authoritative position set forth in the AG memorandum squarely
contradicts the court's determination," DOJ lawyers wrote.
In Orrick's original ruling against the Trump order, he cited comments
by the president and Sessions which suggested the government intended to
target a much wider swath of federal funds.
[to top of second column] |
Sanctuary cities generally offer safe harbor to illegal immigrants
and often do not use municipal funds or resources to advance the
enforcement of federal immigration laws. Dozens of local governments
and cities, including New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, have joined
the growing "sanctuary" movement.
Supporters of the sanctuary policy argue that enlisting police
cooperation in rounding up immigrants for removal undermines
communities' trust in local police, particularly among Latinos.
The Trump administration contends that local authorities endanger
public safety when they decline to hand over for deportation illegal
immigrants arrested for crimes.
Santa Clara County, which includes the city of San Jose and several
smaller Silicon Valley communities, sued in February, saying Trump's
order was unconstitutional. San Francisco filed a similar lawsuit.
(Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by G Crosse and Lisa Shumaker)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |