Supreme Court reverses ruling sparing
killer who forgot the crime
Send a link to a friend
[November 07, 2017]
By Andrew Chung
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on
Monday overturned a lower court ruling that an Alabama man convicted of
killing a police officer in 1985 was no longer legally eligible to be
executed because strokes wiped out his memory of committing the murder.
The nine justices ruled unanimously that Alabama can execute 67-year-old
Vernon Madison, who has spent decades on death row. They said Supreme
Court precedent had not established "that a prisoner is incompetent to
be executed because of a failure to remember his commission of the
crime."
Madison has suffered several strokes in recent years, resulting in
dementia and memory impairment, court papers said. He is legally blind,
cannot walk on his own and speaks with a slur.
Liberal Justice Stephen Breyer, a death penalty critic, wrote in a
separate opinion that Madison's case illustrated "the unconscionably
long periods of time that prisoners often spend on death row awaiting
execution."
The amount of time condemned inmates spend on death row has increased
from seven years in 1987 to more than 19 years in 2017, Breyer said,
meaning the justices will face more cases of states trying to execute
prisoners suffering diseases of old age.
"And we may well have to consider the ways in which lengthy periods of
imprisonment between death sentence and execution can deepen the cruelty
of the death penalty while at the same time undermining its penological
rationale," Breyer wrote.
Alabama had appealed a March federal appeals court ruling that Madison
could not be executed because his memory loss had left him unable to
understand the connection between his crime and the punishment he is due
to receive.
Madison shot Julius Schulte, a police officer in Mobile, twice in the
back of the head as Schulte supervised Madison's move out of his former
girlfriend's house, according to court papers.
[to top of second column] |
Vernon Madison, one of Alabama's longest-serving death row inmates,
pictured in this handout photo, to is set to be executed at William
C. Holman Correctional Facility in Atmore, Alabama, United States on
May 12, 2016 even as the U.S. Supreme Court has ordered a review
into whether the state's current sentencing scheme is
constitutional. Courtesy Alabama Department of Corrections/Handout
via REUTERS/File Photo
Madison, who is black, was sentenced to death in 1994 in his third
trial after his first two convictions were thrown out on appeal for
racial discrimination in jury selection and other prosecutorial
misconduct.
After his execution date was set for May 2016, Madison's attorneys
filed a court challenge saying he was not competent to be put to
death because he could not remember committing the murder. A state
court and a lower federal court denied the request.
But the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in a
2-1 ruling that Madison could not be executed, saying the evidence
showed he has a serious mental disorder resulting in dementia and
believes he did not kill anyone.
"A finding that a man with no memory of what he did wrong has a
rational understanding of why he is being put to death is patently
unreasonable," that court wrote.
(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|