| 
					
 
 While the holidays are around the 
corner, Illinois’ spending habits serve as a reminder not to get too far ahead 
of Black Friday just yet. The difference, however, is that Springfield’s 
indulgences won’t come at a marked-down price. 
 
A spokesman for the Illinois secretary of state has announced the state will 
commit funds to Christmas decorations for the Capitol, according to the State 
Journal-Register, 
 
This is the second year Springfield has ramped up its tab with City Water, Light 
and Power, or CWLP, on Christmas lights since the short-lived elimination of the 
tradition in 2015. With the announcement of the yearly expenditure’s 
discontinuation in 2015, Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White pledged it 
would save the state $7,300 on electricity bills. 
  The Journal-Register quoted White spokesman Henry Haupt at the time, explaining, 
“While the lights add color to the Capitol landscape and are a nice tradition, 
the fact of the matter is the lights are nonessential and the Secretary of 
State’s office is cutting back wherever possible to save money.” 
 
[to top of second column]  | 
            
			 
  
			While a price tag that 
			reads shorter than six digits might seem trivial to the spend-weary 
			Illinoisan’s eye, the state’s pile of past-due bills owed to CWLP 
			has reached $5.5 million. 
			Moreover, despite the 
			state’s discontinuation of funding, Springfield residents did not go 
			without their annual Illinois Capitol Christmas light spectacle in 
			2015. 
			 
			The Basic Crafts Council of Mid-Central Illinois, a union 
			organization, donated Christmas lights that year. 
			 
			To meet demand, supply was voluntarily fulfilled. But this didn’t 
			stop the state from once again insisting on intercepting the cost. 
			 
			One should hope that the state soon becomes alert to the reality 
			facing Illinois’ finances, and warm to commonsense solutions, before 
			it isn’t just Christmas lights that the Illinois Capitol can’t 
			afford to keep on. 
			
			
            
			Click here to respond to the editor about this article  |