| 
             
			
			 Researchers in the U.S. found that women participating in a larger 
			long-term study who conceived within three months of a pregnancy 
			loss had the lowest likelihood of another miscarriage compared to 
			women who waited 6 to 18 months. 
			 
			“We observed that the advice doctors give to women about when to 
			start trying to get pregnant after experiencing a miscarriage varies 
			significantly,” senior study author Digna Velez Edwards told Reuters 
			Health in an email. 
			 
			“Using the ‘Right from the Start’ prospective pregnancy cohort we 
			wanted to further examine this and see if the time between 
			pregnancies (interpregnancy interval) after a miscarriage influenced 
			a woman’s chance of having a miscarriage in her next pregnancy,” 
			said Velez Edwards, a researcher at Vanderbilt University Medical 
			Center in Nashville, Tennessee. 
			
			  
			About 17% of clinically recognized pregnancies end in loss, the 
			study team writes online November 3 in Obstetrics & Gynecology. Most 
			women who experience a miscarriage want to know if they can prevent 
			another miscarriage and may ask their health care providers how long 
			they should wait before trying to conceive again. 
			 
			The Right from the Start study included almost 6,000 women in North 
			Carolina, Tennessee and Texas who were pregnant or planning a 
			pregnancy between 2000 and 2012. 
			 
			Participants filled out health interviews when they entered the 
			study and again at the end of their first trimester. All the women 
			underwent ultrasounds to confirm their pregnancies. 
			 
			A total of 514 women said miscarriage was the outcome of their most 
			recent pregnancy before entering the study. Of those women, about 
			16% had a subsequent miscarriage. 
			 
			When the study team compared interpregnancy intervals, they found 
			that women with intervals of less than three months had about a 7% 
			risk of repeat miscarriage, compared with a 22% risk for women who 
			waited 6 to 18 months weeks after the miscarriage to get pregnant 
			again. 
			 
			Neither race, nor the number of children a woman already had, made a 
			difference in these results. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
            
			Limitations of the study include its size, and the fact that 
			researchers could not assess whether the higher chances of 
			successful pregnancy after a shorter interval might be explained by 
			factors other than the length of the interval, such as the women’s 
			overall “high reproductive fitness.” 
			 
			“Although our study demonstrated that getting pregnant within three 
			months of a previous miscarriage was associated with the lowest risk 
			of a subsequent miscarriage, when to start trying is specific to 
			each woman and depends on when she is ready to start trying again,” 
			Velez Edwards said. 
			 
			The World Health Organization currently recommends waiting at least 
			6 months before attempting another pregnancy, the study team notes. 
			That advice is based on a single study, Velez Edwards said, and the 
			new results are consistent with more recent studies supporting 
			shorter intervals. 
			Women who are emotionally and physically ready to try to get 
			pregnant after a miscarriage may not have to delay getting pregnant 
			to reduce the risk of miscarriage, said Velez Edwards. 
			 
			“If (women) want to try to get pregnant, there's no need to wait 
			unless they personally want to,” said Dr. Thomas Price, an 
			infertility specialist with Duke Health in Durham, North Carolina, 
			who wasn’t involved in the study. 
			  
			
			  
			Price noted that the American Congress of Obstetricians and 
			Gynecologists puts out bulletins with recommendations. “If you read 
			the ACOG recommendation in their bulletins, they do not recommend 
			any wait time after a miscarriage,” he said. 
			 
			SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2m9Qj6n 
			 
			Obstet Gynecol 2017. 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |