Exclusive - State Dept. revolt: Tillerson
accused of violating U.S. law on child soldiers
Send a link to a friend
[November 21, 2017]
By Jason Szep and Matt Spetalnick
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A group of about a
dozen U.S. State Department officials have taken the unusual step of
formally accusing Secretary of State Rex Tillerson of violating a
federal law designed to stop foreign militaries from enlisting child
soldiers, according to internal government documents reviewed by
Reuters.
A confidential State Department “dissent” memo not previously reported
said Tillerson breached the Child Soldiers Prevention Act when he
decided in June to exclude Iraq, Myanmar, and Afghanistan from a U.S.
list of offenders in the use of child soldiers. This was despite the
department publicly acknowledging that children were being conscripted
in those countries.[http://tmsnrt.rs/2jJ7pav]
Keeping the countries off the annual list makes it easier to provide
them with U.S. military assistance. Iraq and Afghanistan are close
allies in the fight against Islamist militants, while Myanmar is an
emerging ally to offset China’s influence in Southeast Asia.
Documents reviewed by Reuters also show Tillerson’s decision was at odds
with a unanimous recommendation by the heads of the State Department’s
regional bureaus overseeing embassies in the Middle East and Asia, the
U.S. envoy on Afghanistan and Pakistan, the department’s human rights
office and its own in-house lawyers. [http://tmsnrt.rs/2Ah6tB4]
“Beyond contravening U.S. law, this decision risks marring the
credibility of a broad range of State Department reports and analyses
and has weakened one of the U.S. government's primary diplomatic tools
to deter governmental armed forces and government-supported armed groups
from recruiting and using children in combat and support roles around
the world,” said the July 28 memo.
Reuters reported in June that Tillerson had disregarded internal
recommendations on Iraq, Myanmar and Afghanistan. The new documents
reveal the scale of the opposition in the State Department, including
the rare use of what is known as the “dissent channel,” which allows
officials to object to policies without fear of reprisals.
The views expressed by the U.S. officials illustrate ongoing tensions
between career diplomats and the former chief of Exxon Mobil Corp
appointed by President Donald Trump to pursue an “America First”
approach to diplomacy.
INTERPRETING THE LAW
The child soldiers law passed in 2008 states that the U.S. government
must be satisfied that no children under the age of 18 “are recruited,
conscripted or otherwise compelled to serve as child soldiers" for a
country to be removed from the list. It currently includes the
Democratic Republic of Congo, Nigeria, Somalia, South Sudan, Mali,
Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
"The Secretary thoroughly reviewed all of the information presented to
him and made a determination about whether the facts presented justified
a listing pursuant to the law,” a State Department spokesperson said
when asked about the officials' allegation that he had violated the law.
In a written response to the dissent memo on Sept. 1, Tillerson adviser
Brian Hook acknowledged that the three countries did use child soldiers.
He said, however, it was necessary to distinguish between governments
“making little or no effort to correct their child soldier violations
... and those which are making sincere - if as yet incomplete -
efforts.”
Hook made clear that America’s top diplomat used what he sees as his
discretion to interpret the law.
'A POWERFUL MESSAGE'
Foreign militaries on the list are prohibited from receiving aid,
training and weapons from Washington unless the White House issues a
waiver based on U.S. “national interest.” In 2016, under the Obama
administration, both Iraq and Myanmar, as well as others such as Nigeria
and Somalia, received waivers.
At times, the human rights community chided President Barack Obama for
being too willing to issue waivers and exemptions, especially for
governments that had security ties with Washington, instead of
sanctioning more of those countries.
“Human Rights Watch frequently criticized President Barack Obama for
giving too many countries waivers, but the law has made a real
difference,” Jo Becker, advocacy director for the children’s rights
division of Human Rights Watch, wrote in June in a critique of
Tillerson’s decision.
The dissenting U.S. officials stressed that Tillerson's decision to
exclude Iraq, Afghanistan and Myanmar went a step further than the Obama
administration's waiver policy by contravening the law and effectively
easing pressure on the countries to eradicate the use of child soldiers.
[to top of second column] |
U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson speaks to staff members at the
U.S. Mission to the U.N. in Geneva, Switzerland October 26, 2017.
REUTERS/Alex Brandon/Pool/File Photo
The officials acknowledged in the documents reviewed by Reuters that
those three countries had made progress. But in their reading of the
law, they said that was not enough to be kept off a list that has
been used to shame governments into completely eradicating the use
of child soldiers.
'UNCONSCIONABLE ACTIONS'
Ben Cardin, ranking Democrat on the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, wrote to Tillerson on Friday saying there were “serious
concerns that the State Department may not be complying” with the
law and that the secretary’s decision "sent a powerful message to
these countries that they were receiving a pass on their
unconscionable actions."
The memo was among a series of previously unreported documents sent
this month to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the State
Department's independent inspector general’s office that relate to
allegations that Tillerson violated the child soldiers law.
Legal scholars say that because of the executive branch’s latitude
in foreign policy there is little legal recourse to counter
Tillerson’s decision.
Herman Schwartz, a constitutional law professor at American
University in Washington, said U.S. courts would be unlikely to
accept any challenge to Tillerson’s interpretation of the child
soldiers law as allowing him to remove a country from the list on
his own discretion.
The signatories to the document were largely senior policy experts
with years of involvement in the issues, said an official familiar
with the matter. Reuters saw a copy of the document that did not
include the names of those who signed it.
Tillerson’s decision to remove Iraq and Myanmar, formerly known as
Burma, from the list and reject a recommendation by U.S. officials
to add Afghanistan was announced in the release of the government’s
annual human trafficking report on June 27.
Six days earlier, a previously unreported memo emailed to Tillerson
from a range of senior diplomats said the three countries violated
the law based on evidence gathered by U.S. officials in 2016 and
recommended that he approve them for the new list.
It noted that in Iraq, the United Nations and non-governmental
organizations “reported that some Sunni tribal forces ... recruited
and used persons younger than the age of 18, including instances of
children taking a direct part in hostilities.”
Ali Kareem, who heads Iraq's High Committee for Human Rights, denied
the country’s military or state-backed militias use child soldiers.
"We can say today with full confidence that we have a clean slate on
child recruitment issues,” he said.
The memo also said “two confirmed cases of child recruitment” by the
Myanmar military “were documented during the reporting period.”
Human rights advocates have estimated that dozens of children are
still conscripted there.
Myanmar government spokesman Zaw Htay challenged accusers to provide
details of where and how child soldiers are being used. He noted
that in the latest State Department report on human trafficking,
"they already recognized (Myanmar) for reducing of child soldiers" –
though the report also made clear some children were still
conscripted.
The memo said further there was “credible evidence” that a
government-supported militia in Afghanistan “recruited and used a
child,” meeting the minimum threshold of a single confirmed case
that the State Department had previously used as the legal basis for
putting a country on the list.
The Afghan defense and interior ministries both denied there were
any child soldiers in Afghan national security forces, an assertion
that contradicts the State Department’s reports and human rights
activists.
(Additional reporting by Raya Jalabi in Baghdad, Antoni Slodkowski
and Shoon Naing in Yangon, Hamid Shalizi in Kabul)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|