| 
			
			 After months of indecisive votes among the 28 member states in 
			Brussels, Germany, whose Chancellor Angela Merkel has yet to form a 
			new coalition after a September election, came off the fence after 
			abstaining in previous meetings. It said it backed a European 
			Commission proposal against the wishes of France. 
 The Commission, the European Union's executive, said in a statement 
			that 18 countries had backed its proposal to renew the chemical's 
			license. Nine countries were against and one abstained, giving a 
			"positive opinion" by the narrowest possible margin under rules 
			requiring more than a simple majority.
 
 The extension was opposed by Germany's center-left Social Democrats 
			(SPD), with which Merkel is expected to launch exploratory talks 
			this week on renewing their "grand coalition" after plans for an 
			alliance with two other parties failed.
 
			
			 
			French President Emmanuel Macron, who was elected in May on a 
			platform of pursuing deeper EU integration alongside Germany, had 
			wanted a shorter extension and a rapid phasing out of glyphosate, 
			which is a mainstay of farming across the continent.
 After the vote, he said he would take all necessary measures to ban 
			the product, originally developed by Monsanto, as soon as an 
			alternative is available and at the latest within three years. 
			Monsanto declined to comment.
 
 Europe has been wrestling for the past two years over what to do 
			with the chemical, a key ingredient in Monsanto's top-selling 
			Roundup, whose license was set to expire on Dec. 15.
 
 The chemical has been used by farmers for more than 40 years, but 
			its safety was cast into doubt when a World Health Organization 
			agency, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 
			concluded in 2015 it probably causes cancer.
 
 The European Union agreed to roll over the license for 18 months 
			pending the results of a study by the European Chemicals Agency, 
			which said in March this year that there was no evidence linking 
			glyphosate to cancer in humans.
 
 Protest groups, however, seized on the IARC report, questioned the 
			science in other studies and complained about the influence of big 
			business.
 
 "The people who are supposed to protect us from dangerous pesticides 
			have failed to do their jobs and betrayed the trust Europeans place 
			in them," Greenpeace said after Monday's vote.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			In theory, the Commission could have pushed through a license 
			extension, but it said it wanted governments to make the call on an 
			issue that has become so politically charged. After a series of 
			indecisive votes, they finally produced a clear majority in favor of 
			the Commission's proposal. 
			"Today's vote shows that when we all want to, we are able to share 
			and accept our collective responsibility in decision making," said 
			health and food safety commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis.
 Farmers association Copa-Cogeca said it was glad a decision had been 
			taken, but regretted the license renewal had not been for 15 years 
			given strong scientific evidence from EU agencies.
 
 The key swing vote came from Germany, whose government is operating 
			in an acting capacity following the indecisive election. Berlin 
			abstained earlier, but threw its weight behind a decision opposed by 
			France.
 
			Poland, Bulgaria and Romania, all did likewise, leaving only 
			Portugal still on the fence on Monday. Had any of the others 
			continued to abstain, deadlock would have gone on. An extension 
			required 16 states representing 65 percent of the EU population to 
			vote in favor. The 18 supporters account for 65.7 percent.
 The German vote exposed internal divisions in Berlin ahead of this 
			week's coalition talks. Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks, an 
			SPD lawmaker, accused the chancellor's center-right group of 
			reneging on a deal to continue abstaining.
 
 French Agriculture Minister Stephane Travert told reporters that 
			Paris would push to change farming practices that embraced 
			alternatives to glyphosate, so that its use could be ended.
 
			
			 
			
			 
			(Additional reporting by Peter Maushagen in Brussels, Sybille de La 
			Hamaide in Paris and Thorsten Severin and Andreas Rinke in Berlin; 
			Editing by Alastair Macdonald and Catherine Evans) 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |