Wider benefits seen in trade deals, challenging
Trump-style mercantilism
Send a link to a friend
[October 04, 2017]
By Tom Miles
GENEVA (Reuters) - International trade
deals have real benefits for small firms' competitiveness and regional
integration, the International Trade Center (ITC) said on Wednesday in
research challenging U.S. President Donald Trump's "America First"
policies.
ITC executive director Arancha Gonzalez said governments often failed to
reflect the wider interests of business in trade negotiations, with a
reluctance to see trade and investment as two sides of the same coin,
and providing only soft support for consumer protection, gender
equality, tax coordination and small firms.
"It's a wake-up call for trade negotiators doing trade agreements to not
apply a purely mercantilist lens but look at the wider implications of
trade," Gonzalez said.
Mercantilism is associated with attempts to use trade to gain economic
advantage over other nations, epitomized by Trump's policies to "make
America great again".
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0e19/e0e192161b8d04227488f6226e59c944a68247db" alt=""
But the research by the ITC, a joint venture of the World Trade
Organization and the United Nations which advises firms on how to
export, found that broadening the scope of trade deals and deepening
regional value chains had greater benefits.
"It's less about sugar, steel and autos and more about the quality and
the coherent way you would put together your trade part, your investment
part, your inclusiveness part, with your sustainability part, with your
fairness part," Gonzalez said.
Each policy area newly covered by a trade deal increased a country's
integration into value chain trade by 2.5 percent, the study found.
Each additional policy area also narrowed the competitiveness gap
between small and big firms by 1.25 percent, enough to lift small
businesses in Tajikistan onto the same competitiveness footing as their
small business counterparts in Estonia.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc292/fc292be6ae23301f2095c8672e23faea8bef71c2" alt=""
Trucks wait in a queue for border customs control to cross into U.S.
at the World Trade Bridge in Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, November 2, 2016.
REUTERS/Daniel Becerril/File Photo
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/265b9/265b9ecd03b794daa40eb1d1460d98356917fd7a" alt=""
"The deeper your regional integration, the more value chain activity you
generate, but the more you close the gap between your small and your large
companies," Gonzalez said.
Trade deals incorporating a chapter on investment were measurably more
beneficial than agreements that focused purely on investment.
While bilateral investment treaties boosted imports within the value chain by
2.8 percent, they did nothing for exports. Trade deals with investment
provisions lifted imports by 3.2 percent and exports by about 2 percent.
The study looked at 279 bilateral or multi-country trade arrangements covering
189 countries, and also found that regional trade integration was a major
success factor for value chains, which are increasingly the route to global
trade for small- and medium-sized enterprises.
Every region is host to regional value chains expect Africa, which was not
sufficiently integrated by trade agreements to create regional critical mass,
the study found, based on ITC's database of 515 African firms.
Some of the strongest African economies were in North Africa but were weak
compared to nearby European competitors, while South Africa - Africa's best shot
at anchoring a value chain - was far behind the leaders in other regions.
(Reporting by Tom Miles; Editing by Richard Balmforth)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a145c/a145c6eaf859e3e8f045b9502a30bd437dd62899" alt="" |