The majority of women in the study had surgery - either a lumpectomy
that removes malignant tissue while sparing the rest of the breast
or a mastectomy that removes the entire breast. Afterwards, many of
them also got chemotherapy or radiation to destroy any remaining
abnormal cells and reduce the risk of cancer coming back.
Women who received the most aggressive treatment - a double
mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction surgery - were almost
eight times more likely to miss a month or more of work than women
who got a lumpectomy, the study found. With a double mastectomy and
reconstruction, women were also three times more likely to stop
working altogether.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8925/f892561e404b30ac8b2a3094343d702c92675f6c" alt=""
“We know that many of the women who are receiving (double)
mastectomy do not have advanced tumors that require mastectomy even
on the affected side,” said lead study author Dr. Reshma Jagsi of
the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.
All of the women had early breast cancer, meaning the tumors had not
spread beyond the breast and nearby lymph nodes. Survival odds are
generally much better for women diagnosed with these early-stage
tumors than for patients with tumors that have metastasized, or
spread to other organs in the body.
“Many of the women who are considering more aggressive surgery tell
me that they are considering this because they want to make sure
they will be there for those who depend on them, both at home and at
work,” Jagsi said by email. “For most women with early-stage breast
cancer, lumpectomy with radiation therapy is an option, will yield
equivalent overall survival to mastectomy, and will actually be less
likely to disrupt their ability to be there for others.”
For the study, researchers examined data on 1,006 working women
diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer in 2014 and 2015. Overall,
84 percent were working full-time before their diagnosis, but only
half of them had paid sick leave and just 38 percent had disability
benefits.
When women got chemotherapy, they were 30 percent more likely to
miss at least a month of work than when they didn’t receive these
drugs, the study found. Chemotherapy was also associated with
roughly four times the odds that women would stop work altogether.
Among women who missed more than a month of work, 29 percent lost
more than $5,000 in income, researchers report in the journal
Cancer.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a574/3a574f3f16be90bfbc59666e7a800d74057bdc17" alt=""
The study wasn’t a controlled experiment designed to prove how
different treatment options directly cause missed work or lost
wages. Another limitation of the study is that researchers lacked
data on why women missed work, and it’s possible some of that time
wasn’t related to the type of treatment they received.
Because the vast majority of women diagnosed with breast cancer can
be cured, and because more aggressive care doesn’t necessarily
improve survival odds, it makes sense for patients to consider the
financial or career impacts of treatment to help decide what makes
sense for them, said Dr. Michael Hassett of the Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute and Harvard Medical School in Boston.
“Women should start by figuring out what treatment has the best
chance of curing their cancer,” Hassett, who wasn’t involved in the
study, said by email. “If more than one effective treatment exists,
then patients should look for the treatment option that has the
least impact on employment or whatever is most relevant to her.”
Too often, discussions women have with their doctors about the best
treatment options don’t include a conversation about the employment
impact, said Dr. Benjamin Smith, of the University of Texas MD
Anderson Cancer Center in Houston.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66717/66717424aabbca5f6dbbe33707929820fc02e85e" alt=""
“This needs to change,” Smith, who wasn’t involved in the study,
said by email. “Patients need to understand how their choices may
influence their employment, and patients need assistance to help
ensure their treatment choices are truly shared decisions that weigh
the potential employment impact of given treatment options.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2y5Wmvh Cancer, online October 9, 2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |