Judge to rule on ex-Penn State coach
Sandusky's bid for new trial
Send a link to a friend
[October 18, 2017]
By David DeKok
HARRISBURG, Pa. (Reuters) - A Pennsylvania
judge is due to rule on Wednesday whether former Penn State University
football coach Jerry Sandusky will receive a new trial on charges that
he sexually assaulted pre-teen and teenaged boys for 15 years.
Sandusky, 73, was convicted in 2012 of exploiting his position in the
top-flight football program to sexually assault 10 boys and is currently
serving a 30- to 60-year prison sentence.
Centre County Court of Common Pleas Judge John Foradora plans to release
his decision at noon ET (1600 GMT)on Wednesday on whether to grant a new
trial to the man whose case led to the firing of longtime head coach Joe
Paterno and prompted the state to toughen its laws on child sex assault.
In his request for a new trial, Sandusky asserted that his original
trial attorneys botched his defense, citing 31 mistakes ranging from
allowing Sandusky to be interviewed by sports journalist Bob Costas to
failing to seek a mistrial after prosecutors in their closing remarks
referred to Sanduksy's decision not to testify at his trial.
Defendants in U.S. criminal trials are not required to testify and often
do not.
"One may ask how can an innocent person be convicted?" said current
Sandusky lawyer Alexander Lindsay in his final brief seeking a new
trial. "By any objective measure, Mr. Sandusky did not receive adequate
representation in this case."
Prosecutors for the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, in their own
final brief, offered rebuttal for each of the 31 claims and urged
Foradora to uphold the conviction.
[to top of second column] |
Convicted child molester Jerry Sandusky (C), a former assistant
football coach at Penn State University, leaves after his appeal
hearing at the Centre County Courthouse in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania,
U.S. on October 29, 2015. REUTERS/Pat Little/File Photo
Peter Goldberger, a lawyer in Ardmore, Pennsylvania, who specializes in
state and federal appeals and has no connection to the case, said that
even if Sandusky prevails on some of the counts, it would not
necessarily result in a new trial.
"Would the outcome have been affected by a better response?" he said.
"It has to be something more than a probability."
Sandusky is serving his sentence at the State Correctional Institution
at Somerset. He was moved there in February from the state's "supermax"
prison at Greene for what the Department of Corrections said were
routine reasons.
"He was glad to be moved," Lindsay said. "The conditions at Somerset are
much better."
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|