Judge blocks latest Trump curbs on people
entering United States
Send a link to a friend
[October 18, 2017]
By Dan Levine and Yeganeh Torbati
SAN FRANCISCO/
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S.
judge on Tuesday blocked President Donald Trump's latest bid to impose
restrictions on citizens from several countries entering the United
States, which would have taken effect this week.
The open-ended ban, announced last month, targeted people from Iran,
Libya, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Chad and North Korea, as well as certain
government officials from Venezuela. It was the third version of a
policy that had previously targeted some Muslim-majority countries but
had been restricted by the courts.
Tuesday's ruling sets up another high stakes battle over Trump's
executive authority which legal experts expect will ultimately land in
the U.S. Supreme Court. Trump's first travel ban in January caused chaos
and protests at U.S. airports before judges halted it.
The state of Hawaii sued to block Trump's latest travel restrictions,
arguing that federal immigration law did not give him the authority to
impose them on six of those countries. Hawaii did not challenge entry
restrictions relating to North Korea and Venezuela.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/935a3/935a321318cf44c891a9c1e38a0df5b28a679fa8" alt=""
U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Honolulu said Hawaii was likely to
succeed in proving that Trump's latest travel ban violates federal
immigration law.
The policy "suffers from precisely the same maladies as its predecessor:
it lacks sufficient findings that the entry of more than 150 million
nationals from six specified countries would be 'detrimental to the
interests of the United States,'" Watson wrote.
The White House in a statement said the ruling was "dangerously flawed"
and that it was confident the courts would ultimately uphold Trump's
policy.
"These restrictions are vital to ensuring that foreign nations comply
with the minimum security standards required for the integrity of our
immigration system and the security of our nation," the statement said.
The Justice Department called Watson's ruling "incorrect" and said it
would appeal "in an expeditious manner."
Following the ruling, the U.S. State Department instructed embassies and
consulates around the world to "resume regular processing of visas" for
citizens of Chad, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, a department
official said on condition of anonymity.
The department will carry out the proclamation for North Korea and
Venezuela "with the objective of maximizing national security," the
official said, because the order did not apply to restrictions on those
countries.
As a candidate, Trump had promised "a total and complete shutdown of
Muslims entering the United States."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1637/c1637c72849b9275d871f087efdf2663aa35fb67" alt=""
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0eeb/f0eeb78ca2aad35aa8d546569d31129f70092e4d" alt=""
A family exits after clearing immigration and customs at Dulles
International Airport in Dulles, Virginia, U.S. September 24, 2017.
REUTERS/James Lawler Duggan
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64ca1/64ca156d33c53aeefa1bc63e043052bada798ebb" alt=""
In announcing the newest travel restrictions, the White House had
portrayed them as necessary consequences for countries that did not meet
new requirements for vetting of immigrants and issuing of visas. Those
requirements were shared in July with foreign governments, which had 50
days to make improvements if needed, the White House said.
A number of countries made improvements by enhancing the security of
travel documents or the reporting of passports that were lost or
stolen. Others did not, sparking the restrictions.
Immigrant advocacy groups cheered the Hawaii ruling.
"We're glad, but not surprised, that President Trump's illegal and
unconstitutional Muslim ban has been blocked once again," Omar
Jadwat, director of the American Civil Liberties Union Immigrants
Rights Project, said in a statement.
The ACLU and other groups have filed separate challenges to Trump's
policy in a Maryland federal court. A ruling is still pending.
In the Hawaii case, the judge said that the ban's national security
rationale was undermined by not knowing how the president settled on
the countries designated by the ban.
The judge also said the proclamation likely runs afoul of a
prohibition in immigration law on nationality-based discrimination
in issuing visas. Watson had blocked Trump's second travel ban in
March.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bcfa9/bcfa90c07c6b6d2219f7e02f9fb4208ed5791769" alt=""
In a statement on Tuesday, Hawaii Attorney General Doug Chin said:
"Today is another victory for the rule of law."
Kiyanoush Razaghi, an immigration attorney with the Catholic Legal
Immigration Network who has many Iranian clients, said Iranians
still have problems when applying for U.S. visas, including
particularly lengthy wait times for security checks.
Razaghi said he has told his clients: "You can celebrate, there is
no travel ban right now, but be careful because that doesn't mean
you are going to get a visa in a reasonable amount of time."
(Additional reporting by Andrew Chung in New York and Mica
Rosenberg, Lawrence Hurley and Roberta Rampton in Washington;
Editing by Chizu Nomiyama, Tom Brown, Grant McCool)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |