Researchers examined data on 104,630 patients who underwent a
variety of common procedures with a total of 3,314 different
surgeons, including 774 females and 2,540 males.
Overall, patients treated by female surgeons were 12 percent less
likely to die within 30 days, and they had similar complications
rates and repeat hospital admissions, the study found.
“There are reasons to believe why female surgeons may have had these
outcomes,” said senior study author Dr. Raj Satkunasivam, a
researcher and surgeon at Houston Methodist Hospital.
“Surgery is a highly male dominated profession so that the cohort of
females truly represents the ‘best of the best’ proportionately more
skilled, motivated, and harder working surgeons who have had to
perhaps pass a ‘higher bar’ to succeed,” Satkunasivam said by email.
Because the study wasn’t a controlled experiment designed to prove
whether or how surgeons’ sex influences patient outcomes, however,
it’s possible that factors such as the complexity of individual
cases might have influenced the results, Satkunasivam noted.
Still, the study should help dispel any biases against female
surgeons in the medical profession, since the women clearly didn’t
perform worse than the men, Satkunasivam and colleagues note in the
BMJ.
The study focused on outcomes for 25 common procedures including a
variety of heart operations, weight-loss surgeries, knee and hip
replacements, and cancer treatments.
Overall, 11.1 percent of patients treated by female surgeons died,
experienced serious complications or had repeat admissions to the
hospital within 30 days of their operations, compared to 11.3
percent with male surgeons, the study found.
This translated into 4 percent lower odds of either death,
complications or repeat admissions with female surgeons.
Researchers also accounted for differences in outcomes for
procedures that were scheduled in advance, when patients can often
choose their surgeon, and emergency operations, when patients
typically do not make this choice.
[to top of second column] |
One limitation of the study is that researchers lacked some data on
patients that might impact their odds of death or complications,
such as other medical problems or socioeconomic factors like income.
While the findings should dispel any lingering biases against female
surgeons, it’s unlikely that the sex of the surgeon would be a good
way to predict how well patients will do after their operations,
Derek Alderson, president of the Royal College of Surgeons of
England, and past-president Clare Marx write in an accompanying
editorial.
However, the results do support giving female surgeons the same
career opportunities as their male counterparts, said Dr. Heather
Logghe, author of a separate accompanying editorial and a researcher
at Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia.
“Given the historical exclusion of women from surgical training and
today’s glass ceiling in terms of leadership positions, academic
promotion, and pay equity among surgeons, this study is hugely
impactful,” Logghe said by email. “It demonstrates that based on
clinical outcomes there should be parity in leadership, promotion,
and pay for women surgeons.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2yCMQBV BMJ, online October 10, 2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|