The
American Legion, which rarely speaks out on bank policy or
politics, said in a statement it would "not be silent while
banks and payday loan shops rip off servicemembers and
veterans". But it will likely have a hard time convincing Trump
to veto the resolution to roll back the Obama-era policy.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an independent federal
regulator, finalized a rule this summer that barred banks,
credit card issuers and other financial companies from requiring
customers to agree not to join group lawsuits and only take any
potential disputes to closed-door arbitration.
In a vote of 51 to 50, the Senate on Tuesday passed a resolution
killing the rule and prohibiting regulators from enacting a
similar one in the future. The House of Representatives approved
the resolution earlier, and now all that is needed to erase the
rule is for Trump to sign it into law.
"Our membership has stated unequivocally that we are opposed to
situations where our military and veterans’ financial
protections are chipped away to increase the profits of the big
banks,” said American Legion National Commander Denise Rohan.
“Repealing the CFPB arbitration rule takes away consumers' most
effective tool to protect themselves against predatory lenders.”
Servicemembers can struggle to sue companies individually
because they cannot afford legal costs, move frequently for
work, or are deployed overseas, the Legion said.
In class actions, individuals with the same complaint band
together to lower lawsuit costs.
Many veteran organizations tried for months to stop the
Republican-led Congress from passing the resolution, and other
advocacy groups have also pressed for a veto.
That is a long-shot.
The White House issued a statement shortly after Tuesday's vote
applauding the resolution, saying the CFPB rule would have given
consumers "fewer options for quickly and efficiently resolving
financial disputes" and opened "the door to frivolous lawsuits
by special interest trial lawyers."
The rule's supporters say arbitration is rigged against
consumers because it is secretive, does not set legal precedent,
and is controlled by the companies. They also say the right to
sue is enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.
(Reporting by Lisa Lambert; Editing by Andrew Hay)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|
|